Diabetes Care Editors’ Expert Forum 2018: Managing Big Data for Diabetes Research and Care

Author:

Riddle Matthew C.1ORCID,Blonde Lawrence2,Gerstein Hertzel C.3ORCID,Gregg Edward W.4ORCID,Holman Rury R.5ORCID,Lachin John M.6ORCID,Nichols Gregory A.7ORCID,Turchin Alexander8ORCID,Cefalu William T.9

Affiliation:

1. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

2. Ochsner Diabetes Clinical Research Unit, Frank Riddick Diabetes Institute, Department of Endocrinology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA

3. McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

5. Diabetes Trial Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.

6. The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Rockville, MD

7. Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR

8. Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

9. American Diabetes Association, Arlington, VA

Abstract

Technological progress in the past half century has greatly increased our ability to collect, store, and transmit vast quantities of information, giving rise to the term “big data.” This term refers to very large data sets that can be analyzed to identify patterns, trends, and associations. In medicine—including diabetes care and research—big data come from three main sources: electronic medical records (EMRs), surveys and registries, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These systems have evolved in different ways, each with strengths and limitations. EMRs continuously accumulate information about patients and make it readily accessible but are limited by missing data or data that are not quality assured. Because EMRs vary in structure and management, comparisons of data between health systems may be difficult. Registries and surveys provide data that are consistently collected and representative of broad populations but are limited in scope and may be updated only intermittently. RCT databases excel in the specificity, completeness, and accuracy of their data, but rarely include a fully representative sample of the general population. Also, they are costly to build and seldom maintained after a trial’s end. To consider these issues, and the challenges and opportunities they present, the editors of Diabetes Care convened a group of experts in management of diabetes-related data on 21 June 2018, in conjunction with the American Diabetes Association’s 78th Scientific Sessions in Orlando, FL. This article summarizes the discussion and conclusions of that forum, offering a vision of benefits that might be realized from prospectively designed and unified data-management systems to support the collective needs of clinical, surveillance, and research activities related to diabetes.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference104 articles.

1. Database technology in health care;Wiederhold;J Med Syst,1981

2. Better care at less cost without miracles;Faltermayer,1970

3. A clinical database management system for improved integration of the Veterans Affairs Hospital Information System;Andrews;J Med Syst,1989

4. Information technology in the English National Health Service;Chantler;JAMA,2006

5. National Center for Health Statistics . National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey history [Internet], 14 November 2011. Available from www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/history.htm. Accessed 15 January 2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3