Comparison of the Effects of Three Insulinotropic Drugs on Plasma Insulin Levels After a Standard Meal
Author:
Cozma Lawrence S.1, Luzio Stephen D.1, Dunseath Gareth J.1, Langendorg Kirsten W.2, Pieber Thomas3, Owens David R.1
Affiliation:
1. Diabetes Research Unit, University Hospital of Wales, College of Medicine, South Glamorgan, Wales 2. Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark 3. Med Universitatsklinik Graz, Graz, Austria
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To compare the effects of repaglinide, glipizide, and glibenclamide on insulin secretion and postprandial glucose after a single standard 500-kcal test meal.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 12 type 2 diabetic patients with early diabetes (mean HbA1c of 6.1%) and 12 matched control subjects were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Subjects received placebo, 2 mg repaglinide, 5 mg glipizide, and 5 mg glibenclamide in a random fashion during the trial. Administration of each drug was followed by a single standard 500-kcal test meal. A washout period of 7–12 days existed between the four study visits.
RESULTS—All three drugs were equally effective on the total prandial insulin secretion (area under the curve [AUC] −15 to 240 min). However, clear differences were noted in the early insulin secretion (AUC −15 to 30 min); both repaglinide and glipizide increased secretion in nondiabetic subjects by ∼61 and 34%, respectively, compared with placebo. In the diabetic patients, the difference versus placebo was 37 and 47%, respectively. The difference between glipizide and glibenclamide reached significance in both groups of subjects, whereas repaglinide was more effective than glibenclamide only in the healthy nondiabetic subject group. All three drugs were effective in decreasing total glucose AUC in the nondiabetic and diabetic population. In the nondiabetic subjects, however, repaglinide was significantly more effective than glibenclamide. The differences disappeared in the diabetic subjects, probably as a result of increased prevalence of insulin resistance in this group.
CONCLUSIONS—Repaglinide and glipizide but not glibenclamide significantly enhanced the early insulin secretion in both nondiabetic and diabetic subjects with preserved β-cell function after a single standard meal.
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Panzram G: Mortality and survival in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 30: 123–131, 1987 2. Turner RC, Millns H, Neil HA, Stratton IM, Manley SE, Matthews DR, Holman RR: Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23). BMJ 316:823–828, 1998 3. Yudkin JS, Blauth C, Drury P, Fuller J, Henley J, Lancaster T, Lankester J, Lean M, Pentecost B, Press V, Rothman D: Prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: an evidence base. Diabet Med 13(Suppl. 4):S101–S121, 1996 4. Vehkavaara S, Seppala-Lindroos A, Westerbacka J, Groop PH, Yki-Jarvinen H: In vivo endothelial dysfunction characterizes patients with impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care 22:2055–2060, 1999 5. Balletshofer BM, Rittig K, Enderle MD, Volk A, Maerker E, Jacob S, Matthaei S, Rett K, Haring HU: Endothelial dysfunction is detectable in young normotensive first-degree relatives of subjects with type 2 diabetes in association with insulin resistance. Circulation 101:1780–1784, 2000
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|