Affiliation:
1. Army Medical Surveillance Activity, Washington, DC
2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland
3. Delmarva Foundation for Medical Care, Inc., Easton, Maryland
4. Texas Medical Foundation, Austin, Texas
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To examine state variability in diabetes care for Medicare beneficiaries and the impact of certain beneficiary characteristics on those variations.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes, aged 18–75 years, were identified from 1997 to 1999 claims data. Claims data were used to construct rates for three quality of care measures (HbA1c tests, eye examinations, and lipid profiles). Person-level variables (e.g., age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status) were used to adjust state rates using logistic regression.
RESULTS—A third of 2 million beneficiaries with diabetes aged 18–75 years did not have annual HbA1c tests, biennial eye examinations, or biennial lipid profiles. There was wide variability in the measures among states (e.g., receipt of HbA1c tests ranged from 52 to 83%). Adjustment using person-level variables reduced the variance in HbA1c tests, eye examinations, and lipid profiles by 30, 23, and 27%, respectively, but considerable variability remained. The impact of the adjustment variables was also inconsistent across measures.
CONCLUSIONS—Opportunities remain for improvement in diabetes care. Large variations in care among states were reduced significantly by adjustment for characteristics of state residents. However, much variability remained unexplained. Variability of measures within states and variable impact of the adjustment variables argues against systems effects operating with uniformity on the three measures. These findings suggest that a single approach to quality improvement is unlikely to be effective. Further understanding variability will be important to improving quality.
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference45 articles.
1. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, Eberhardt MS, Goldstein DE, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, Byrd-Holt DD: Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey 1988–1994. Diabetes Care 21: 518–524, 1998
2. Franse LV, Di Bari M, Shorr RI, Resnick HE, van Eijk JT, Bauer DC, Newman AB, Pahor M: Type 2 diabetes in older well-functioning people: who is undiagnosed? Diabetes Care 24:2065, 2001
3. Hadden WC, Harris MI: Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes, Undiagnosed Diabetes, and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Adults 20–74 Years of Age, United States, 1976–1980. Washington, DC, Dept. of Health and Human Services, Vital and Health Statistics (series 11, no. 237, publ. PHS 87-1687)
4. American Diabetes Association: Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in 1997. Diabetes Care 21:296–317, 1998
5. Health Care Financing Administration: Medicare: a brief summary [article online]. Available from http://www.hcfa.gov/pubforms/actuary/ormedmed/default3.htm. Accessed 12 November 2001
Cited by
77 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献