Losartan Reduces the Costs Associated With Diabetic End-Stage Renal Disease
Author:
Herman William H.1, Shahinfar Shahnaz2, Carides George W.2, Dasbach Erik J.2, Gerth William C.2, Alexander Charles M.2, Cook John R.2, Keane William F.2, Brenner Barry M.3,
Affiliation:
1. Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan 2. Merck & Company, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 3. Renal Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the within-trial effect of losartan and conventional antihypertensive therapy (CT) compared with placebo and CT on the economic cost associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The Reduction of End Points in Type 2 Diabetes With the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study was a multinational double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the renal protective effects of losartan on a background of CT (excluding ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor agonists [AIIAs]) in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The primary composite end point was doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death. Data on the duration of ESRD were used to estimate the economic benefits of slowing the progression of nephropathy. The cost associated with ESRD was estimated by combining the days each patient experienced ESRD with the cost of ESRD over time. The cost of ESRD for individuals with diabetes was estimated using data from the U.S. Renal Data System. Total cost was estimated as the sum of the cost associated with ESRD and the cost of study therapy.
RESULTS—We estimated that losartan and CT compared with placebo and CT reduced the number of days with ESRD by 33.6 per patient over 3.5 years (P = 0.004, 95% CI 10.9–56.3). This reduction in ESRD days resulted in a decrease in cost associated with ESRD of $5,144 per patient (P = 0.003, 95% CI $1,701 to $8,587). After accounting for the cost of losartan, the reduction in ESRD days resulted in a net savings of $3,522 per patient over 3.5 years (P = 0.041, $143 to $6,900).
CONCLUSIONS—Treatment with losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy not only reduced the incidence of ESRD, but also resulted in substantial cost savings.
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference13 articles.
1. U.S. Renal Data System: USRDS 2001 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2001 2. U.S. Renal Data System: Table A.1, USRDS, 2000, and Table K.1, USRDS, 2000. In USRDS 2000 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2000, p. 251 and 757 3. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S: Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 345: 861–869, 2001 4. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 25(Suppl. 1):S33–S49, 2002 5. Wolfe RA, Hirth RA, Port FK, Ashby VB, Dor A, Golper TA, Orzol SM, Pereira BJG, Held PJ: Mortality and costs in the first year of dialysis: a comparison between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) (Abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 9:241A, 1998
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|