Affiliation:
1. From the Departments of Medicine (M.S.) and Pediatrics (N.S.) and the Bowen Research Center (M.P.), Indiana University School of Medicine; and the Regenstrief Institute (M.S.), Indianapolis, Indiana.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE— In 1994, the Oregon Health Plan (OHP) expanded basic Medicaid insurance to residents under the federal poverty limit, adopted a prioritized limited benefits package, and converted to managed care. The quality of care in predominantly Medicaid populations with diabetes has not been previously described. In OHP enrollees, we examined predictors of diabetes care based on American Diabetes Association guidelines and described OHP diabetes care compared with national benchmarks.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— Chart abstraction and Medicaid data for 1995-1996 yielded 996 nonpregnant diabetic patients who were 18-64 years of age. Using HbAlc, lipid panel, and urine protein/microalbumin documentation ordered during the study year, we constructed a standard care (SC) index: SC for all three tests, mixed care(MC) for one to two tests, or no tests documented (NTD).
RESULTS— Our sample was predominantly white, 48 ± 11 years of age, 63% women, with 8 ± 5 provider visits. Providers ordered HbAlc (70%), urine microalbumin/protein (57%), and lipid panel(41%) tests. Patients distributed into SC (22%), MC (62%), or NTD (16%). Thirteen variables predicted SC. Patients had a higher likelihood of SC if they were 18-24 years of age, had more clinic visits, were on insulin daily,were in several comorbid groups, were enrolled in salaried or capitated health plans, or lived in counties with more hospital beds. Four studies were used as comparable national benchmarks.
CONCLUSIONS— Care provided to OHP patients with diabetes compares favorably with national benchmarks. Yet, most OHP patients with diabetes are still not achieving optimal care. Examining predictors of SC may play an important role in further policy development.
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference39 articles.
1. Jencks SEM: Measuring quality of care under Medicare and Medicaid. Health Care Financ Rev 16:39-55, 1995
2. O'Connor PJ, Rush WA, Peterson J, Morben P, Cherney L, Keogh C,Lasch S: Evaluation of Medicaid managed care: satisfaction, access and use. JAMA 276:50-55, 1996
3. Bronstein JM, Johnson VA, Fargarson CAJ: Impact of care setting on cost and quality under Medicaid. J Health Care Poor Underserved 8:202-214, 1997
4. Nichols LM: What price health care quality? USA Today Magazine 127:50-51, 1999
5. Smith WR, Cotter JJ, Rossiter LE: System change: quality assessment and improvement for Medicaid managed care. Health Care Financ Rev 17: 97-116,1996
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献