Affiliation:
1. Department of Technology Assessment and Biostatistics, National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the efficacy of lifestyle education for preventing type 2 diabetes in individuals at high risk by meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, as assessed by incidence and a reduced level of plasma glucose 2 h after a 75-g oral glucose load (2-h plasma glucose).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Through an electronic search, 123 studies were identified. A literature search identified eight studies that met strict inclusion criterion of meta-analysis for 2-h plasma glucose and five studies for the incidence of diabetes. All were randomized controlled trials of ≥6 months with lifestyle education that included a dietary intervention. Subjects were adults diagnosed as being at high risk for type 2 diabetes. The difference in mean reduction of 2-h plasma glucose from baseline to the 1-year follow-up and relative risk (RR) of the incidence of diabetes in the lifestyle education group versus the control group were assessed. Overall estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Those estimates were confirmed by several models, and the possibility of selection bias was examined using a funnel plot.
RESULTS—Lifestyle education intervention reduced 2-h plasma glucose by 0.84 mmol/l (95% CI 0.39–1.29) compared with the control group. The 1-year incidence of diabetes was reduced by ∼50% (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44–0.69) compared with the control group. Results were stable and little changed if data were analyzed by subgroups or other statistical models. Funnel plots revealed no selection bias.
CONCLUSIONS—Lifestyle education was effective for reducing both 2-h plasma glucose and RR in high-risk individuals and may be a useful tool in preventing diabetes.
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference23 articles.
1. American Diabetes Association: Nutrition principles and recommendations in diabetes. Diabetes Care 27(Suppl. 1): S36–S46, 2004
2. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, Hu ZX, Lin J, Xiao JZ, Cao HB, Liu PA, Jiang XG, Jiang YY, Wang JP, Zheng H, Zhang H, Bennett PH, Howard BV: Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance: the Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 20:537–544, 1997
3. Watanabe M, Yamaoka K, Yokotsuka M, Tango T: Randomized controlled trial of a new dietary education program to prevent type 2 diabetes in a high-risk group of Japanese male workers. Diabetes Care 26:3209–3214, 2003 [erratum in Diabetes Care 27:856, 2004]
4. World Health Organization: Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications. Part 1 : Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of a WHO Consultation Geneva, World Health Org., 1999, p. 1–59
5. American Diabetes Association: Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 20:1183–1197, 1997
Cited by
204 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献