Affiliation:
1. Med. Kunik III und Poliklinik der Justus-Liebig Universitaet Giessen; The Boehringer Ingelheim KG, Abteilung Medizin; Boehringer Ingelheim Deutschland; and the MDI-Biometrie
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To prove the efficacy of mexiletine in painful diabetic neuropathy.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Treatment was provided in three dosages. For pain measurements, a VAS and McGill's verbal rating scale were chosen. Ninety-five patients were included in the study.
RESULTS
A global assessment of the VAS among patients showed no differences between mexiletine treatment and placebo. The total evaluation (PRIT) of the McGill scale fell just below the level of significance. More specific exploratory evaluations of subclasses of the McGill scale, representing different degrees of pain, gave remarkable differences between mexiletine and placebo in sensory and miscellaneous items. In special subgroups, which were formed according to types and courses of complaints compiled at the beginning of this evaluation, the substantial advantages of the mexiletine treatment were shown with both the VAS and the McGill scale.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence strongly indicates that, in particular, those patients with stabbing or burning pain, heat sensations, or formication will benefit most by mexiletine therapy. Concerning the dosage, a medium regimen of 450 mg/day seems to be appropriate. With an increase in the antiarryhthmic dosage level, the efficacy does not rise proportionally. Mexiletine proved to be a safe therapy with negligible side effects at the medium dose range, even < placebo; and remarkably, no cardiovascular side effects were noted. Further studies should avoid global assessments and pay more attention to the variety of complaints and quality of life.
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Cited by
141 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献