An Asian Multicenter Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Tolerability of Acarbose Compared With Placebo in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Previously Treated With Diet

Author:

Chan Juliana CN1,Chan Kin-Wei A2,HO Larry LT3,Fuh Martin MC4,Horn Lee Chung5,Sheaves Richard5,Panelo Araceli A6,Kim Duk-Kyu7,Embong Mustaffa8,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital Shatin, Hong Kong, China

2. College of Public Health, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

3. Veterans' General Hospital Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

4. Tri-Service General Hospital Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

5. Toa Payoh Hospital Singapore

6. Institute for the Studies of Diabetes Foundation, University of East-Ramon Magasaysay Memorial Medical Center Quezon City, Philippines

7. Dong-A University Hospital Pusan, Korea

8. Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of acarbose versus placebo during a 24-week treatment period in Asian type 2 diabetic patients with dietary failure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After a 6-week screening period, 126 multiethnic Asian type 2 diabetic patients (64 men, 62 women; mean age ± SD, 53.4 ± 10 years) were randomized to receive acarbose (n = 63) or placebo (n = 63). The dosage was increased from 50 mg t.i.d. at week 0 to 100 mg t.i.d. at week 4. Patients were then followed up at weeks 10, 16, and 24. At each visit, body weight, blood pressure, and metabolic indexes were measured. At weeks 0 and 24, fasting plasma glucose and insulin were measured before and 1 h after the administration of an individually tailored breakfast. RESULTS Using the intention-to-treat analysis, there were greater reductions in (mean [95% CI]) HbA1c (−0.70 [−1.00 to −0.39] vs. −0.27% [−0.54 to 0]; P = 0.04), fasting plasma glucose (−0.37 [−0.75 to 0.02] vs. 0.41 mmol/1 [−0.08 to 0.90]; P = 0.017) and 1-h plasma glucose (−0.77 [−1.44 to −0.10] vs. 0.65 mmol/1 [−0.07 to 1.36]; P = 0.05) in the acarbose group compared with the placebo group. With acarbose treatment, 78% of patients achieved an HbA1c <8% compared with 56% in the placebo group (P = 0.003). There was a greater reduction in body weight (−1.31 [−2.46 to −0.15] vs. 0.16 kg [−3.36 to 0.10]; P = 0.02) and higher incidence of flatulence (56 vs. 37%; P = 0.032) in the acarbose than in the placebo group. Using baseline HbA1c and race as covariates, there were no significant interethnic differences in treatment responses (P = 0.232 for treatment-race interaction; P < 0.001 for treatment effect). The dropout rates were similar between the two groups (acarbose, 11 of 63; placebo, 6 of 63). There were no significant laboratory adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter study involving six ethnic groups, acarbose 100 mg t.i.d. was an effective, safe, and generally well-tolerated therapy in Asian type 2 diabetic patients with dietary failure. In some patients with troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms, a lower dosage may be necessary.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3