Affiliation:
1. Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To quantify total diabetes care received (generalist or specialist) from diagnosis onward and its association with the incidence of diabetes complications in a representative cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 429 subjects from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study, a prospective follow-up study of childhood-onset type 1 diabetic subjects first seen between 1986 and 1988 (mean age 28 years, mean duration 19 years), followed biennially for up to 10 years were studied. Specialist care was defined as care received from a board-certified endocrinologist, diabetologist, or diabetes clinic and quantified as the percent of diabetes duration spent in specialist care.
RESULTS—There was a significant trend for a higher incidence of neuropathy, overt nephropathy, and coronary artery disease with lower use of specialist care. Multivariate analyses controlling for diabetes duration, demographic characteristics, health care practices, and physiological risk factors demonstrated that higher past use of specialist care was found to be significantly protective against the development of overt nephropathy (risk ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.88) and neuropathy (0.54, 0.35–0.83) and weakly protective against coronary artery disease (0.65, 0.37–1.1).
CONCLUSIONS—A higher proportion of diabetes duration spent in specialist care may result in delayed development of certain diabetes complications independent of other risk factors. This study thus supports the concept that the benefits of specialist care should be available to all patients with type 1 diabetes.
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Clancy CM, Franks P: Utilization of specialty and primary care: the impact of HMO insurance and patient-related factors. J Fam Pract 45: 500–508, 1997
2. Cooper PF, NIchols LM, Taylor AK: Patient choice of physician: do health insurance and physician characteristics matter? Inquiry 33:237–246, 1996
3. Fendrick AM, Hirth RA, Chernew ME: Differences between generalist and specialist physicians regarding helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease. Am J Gastroenterol 91:1544–1548, 1996
4. Schreiber TL, Elkhatib A, Grines CL, O’Neill WW: Cardiologist versus internist management of patients with unstable angina: treatment patterns and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:577–582, 1995
5. Vollmer WM, O’Hollaren M, Ettinger KM, Stibolt T, Wilkins J, Buist S, Linton KLP, Osborne ML: Specialty differences in the management of asthma: a cross-sectional assessment of allergists’ patients and generalists’ patients in a large HMO. Arch Intern Med 157:1201–1208, 1997
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献