Effect of Follow-Up of Women With Gestational Diabetes on the Ratio of IDDM to NIDDM in Pregnancy

Author:

Beischer Norman A1,Wein Peter1,Sheedy Mary T1,Dargaville Richard M2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Melbourne, Australia

2. University of Melbourne, and the Mercy Hospital for Women Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We wished to test the hypothesis that the diagnosis of diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes in our follow-up program had altered the ratio of IDDM to NIDDM in our pregnant population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We identified all pregnancies managed at the Mercy Hospital for Women in Melbourne, Australia, from 1971 to 1994 that were complicated by prepregnancy diabetes. In these 374 pregnancies, we identified those women who had previously been diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The changing prevalences over time of prepregnancy IDDM and NIDDM, as well as the contribution to both of these conditions made by women who had previously had GDM, were calculated. RESULTS Over the period of the study, there was an increase in the prevalence of IDDM from 0.15 to 0.44% (χ2 for trend, P < 0.00001) and NIDDM from 0.03 to 0.11% (χ2 for trend, P = 0.0001). The proportion of all women with diabetes with NIDDM did not change significantly (16.7–20%). There was a progressive increase in the proportion of women with NIDDM who had had GDM (from 8.3 to 39.1%), but the trend was not statistically significant (P = 0.059). Women with NIDDM were more likely (20 of 64, 31.3%) to have had gestational diabetes in the past than women with IDDM (12 of 310, 3.9%, odds ratio 11.3, 95% CI 5.16–24.7, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Despite finding relatively young women to have NIDDM, our GDM follow-up clinic has not yet altered significantly the ratio of IDDM to NIDDM in pregnancy.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3