Impact of a Program to Improve Adherence to Diabetes Guidelines by Primary Care Physicians

Author:

Kirkman M. Sue12,Williams Susanna R.1,Caffrey Helena H.1,Marrero David G.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

2. Roudebush Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Previous studies have shown that primary care physician (PCP) adherence to diabetes guidelines is suboptimal. We sought to determine the state of diabetes care given by independently practicing PCPs in a rural county in Indiana and whether a multifaceted intervention targeting PCPs, patients, and the health care system would improve adherence to diabetes guidelines. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Baseline audits to assess adherence to diabetes guidelines were done on charts of the seven PCPs in the county. Audits were repeated after development of local consensus guidelines and feedback of baseline performance and after implementation of various interventions (practice aids, physician detailing, patient education sessions, and implementation of computerized individual meal planning). RESULTS—Before any intervention, rates of adherence to guidelines were low (15% for foot exams, 20% for HbA1c measurement, 23% for eye exam referrals, 33% for urine protein screening, 44% for lipid profiles, 73% for home glucose monitoring, and 78% for blood pressure measurements). One year after development of local consensus guidelines and feedback of baseline performance, significant improvements were seen in blood pressure measurements (71 vs. 83%; P = 0.002), foot exams (19 vs. 42%; P < 0.001), HbA1c measurements (26 vs. 37%; P = 0.012), and PCP eye exams (38 vs. 46%; P = 0.043); a trend toward improvement was seen in referral to eye specialists (25 vs. 33%; P = 0.059). After a second year of multiple interventions, only blood pressure measurements (70 vs. 92%; P < 0.001) and foot exams (22 vs. 47%; P < 0.001) remained significantly improved; all other areas returned to rates indistinguishable from baseline. CONCLUSIONS—In busy primary care practices lacking organizational support and computerized tracking systems, sustained improvements in diabetes care are difficult to attain using traditional physician-targeted approaches.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Janes GR: Ambulatory medical care for diabetes. In: Diabetes in America. 2nd edition. National Diabetes Data Group, Ed. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, 1995, p. 541–552

2. Marrero DG, Moore PS, Langefeld CD, Golichowski A, Clark CM: The treatment of patients with insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus by primary care physicians. J Commun Health 16:259–267, 1991

3. Kraft SK, Lazaridis EN, Qiu C, Clark CM, Marrero DG: Screening and treatment of diabetic nephropathy by primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med 14:88–97, 1999

4. Jacques CHM, Jones RL, Houts P, Bauer LC, Dwyer KM, Lynch JC, Casale TSM: Reported practice behaviors for medical care of patients with diabetes by primary care physicians in Pennsylvania. Diabetes Care 14:712–771, 1991

5. Survey of Physician Practice Behaviors Related to the Treatment of People with Diabetes Mellitus. Final report. Washington, DC, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 1990

Cited by 152 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3