Racial and Ethnic Differences in Anthropometric Measures as Risk Factors for Diabetes

Author:

Luo Juhua1ORCID,Hendryx Michael2ORCID,Laddu Deepika3,Phillips Lawrence S.45,Chlebowski Rowan6,LeBlanc Erin S.7ORCID,Allison David B.1,Nelson Dorothy A.8,Li Yueyao1,Rosal Milagros C.9,Stefanick Marcia L.10,Manson JoAnn E.11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN

2. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN

3. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

4. Atlanta VA Health Care System, Decatur, GA

5. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

6. City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA

7. Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research NW, Portland, OR

8. Department of Sociology, Anthropology, Social Work, and Criminal Justice, Oakland University, Rochester, MI

9. Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA

10. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

11. Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The study objective was to examine the impact of race/ethnicity on associations between anthropometric measures and diabetes risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 136,112 postmenopausal women aged 50–79 years participating in the Women’s Health Initiative without baseline cancer or diabetes were followed for 14.6 years. BMI, waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were measured in all participants, and a subset of 9,695 had assessment of whole-body fat mass, whole-body percent fat, trunk fat mass, and leg fat mass by DXA. Incident diabetes was assessed via self-report. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations between anthropometrics and diabetes incidence. RESULTS During follow-up, 18,706 cases of incident diabetes were identified. BMI, WC, and WHR were all positively associated with diabetes risk in each racial and ethnic group. WC had the strongest association with risk of diabetes across all racial and ethnic groups. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, associations with WC were weaker in black women (P < 0.0001) and stronger in Asian women (P < 0.0001). Among women with DXA determinations, black women had a weaker association with whole-body fat (P = 0.02) but a stronger association with trunk-to-leg fat ratio (P = 0.03) compared with white women. CONCLUSIONS In postmenopausal women across all racial/ethnic groups, WC was a better predictor of diabetes risk, especially for Asian women. Better anthropometric measures that reflect trunk-to-leg fat ratio may improve diabetes risk assessment for black women.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States [Internet], 2017. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2018

2. Determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women in the U.S.: the Women’s Health Initiative 1993-2009;Ma;Diabetes Care,2012

3. Body fat distribution in pre-and post-menopausal women: metabolic and anthropometric variables;Garaulet;J Nutr Health Aging,2002

4. Racial differences in abdominal depot-specific adiposity in white and African American adults;Katzmarzyk;Am J Clin Nutr,2010

5. Abdominal fat distribution and metabolic risk factors: effects of race;Lovejoy;Metabolism,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3