Abstract
This study aims to explore the culture of reading literary texts in higher education and the strategies that can enhance the acquisition and learning of the content knowledge for both English Language and Literature in English. The study adopted an interpretivist paradigm and qualitative research design. The study is qualitative in nature. Language in/for/with content and schema theories form the basis for the study. The former holds that language cannot be acquired outside content whilst schemata are stored mental structures that determine the acquisition of new knowledge; thus, literary content knowledge may not be acquired/learned outside linguistic and communicative competencies and vice versa. Data were collected from the relevant literature from the past six years. It was interpreted and analysed thematically. The results showed that students' habit of reading is poor which affects their academic performance. In addition, new technological devices make learning easier and more accessible, but it negatively affects students' ability to read authentic texts for information and entertainment. The study therefore concludes that university students do not read literary texts because of the bad use of information and communication technology. However, the use of digital libraries could improve the situation. The findings suggest that institutions of higher learning should have strategies to engage linguists and literary scholars in the habit of reading literary texts. University libraries should be equipped with relevant and updated digital reading materials.
Publisher
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference65 articles.
1. Akkaya, N., & Ç?v??n, H. (2020). Dijital okuma öz yeterlilik ölçe?i: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çal??mas? [Digital reading self-efficacy scale: Validity and reliability study]. In Entrepreneurship and Innovation (Eds. F. Güne? and A.D. I??k), 20-29. Ankara: SEAD.
2. Al Aghar, T., Demirci H. C., Houjeir R., McMinn M., & Ali Saif Alzaabi, K. (2023). Investigating Arabic teachers’ perceptions of extensive reading practices in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2162701.
3. Alex-Nmecha, J. C., & Horsfall, M. N. (2019). Reading culture, benefits, and the role of libraries in the 21st century. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-11.
4. Arslan, A. (2023). Determining the effect of university students' technology usage levels on digital reading self-efficacy. Bart?n University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(1), 73-84.
5. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research? Qualitative Sociology, (2), 139-160.