Abstract
The study looked at how the differences in gender and the social setting affect society's perceptions of women’s ability to communicate as leaders. Research shows how culture influences individual thinking, language, communication, and behaviour. The study indicated that gender construct influences individuals’ attitudes, emotions, and behaviours. The same is true for assigned positions in society depending on gender and leadership position. The problem identified cultural aspects of leadership that represent variations in gender norms and communication styles for women in leadership and elements linked to sexual distinction. This article, therefore, focuses on the problems that culture influences gender communication. The research adopted a qualitative approach, a systematic analysis of the literature of the baseline data collected, forming part of a randomised controlled sample collection. The findings indicate the persistent gender discrepancies in communication in several contexts, as women prefer to use more concrete vocabulary in several contexts, emphasising how people can achieve goals, including specifics, and using terms that are easy to imagine. It is no mystery that we are in a period of transformation, and attitudes about sex and gender leadership are changing, therefore, understanding the problems of sexual difference and women’s ability to communicate in leadership can be addressed by creating and strengthening an adequate framework with the condition of a mentality change.
Publisher
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference49 articles.
1. Anghel, P. (2010). Diferen?e de sex, gen ?icultur? în comunicare [Culture, Gender and Sexual Differences in Communication]. Available from: http://www.poezie.ro/index.php/essay/13960461/Diferen%C5%A3e_de_sex,_gen_si_cultur%C4%83_%C3%AEn_comunicare Accessed: June 2023
2. Ani, C.K.C. (2013). Redefining the concept of women Empowerment: the vision and quest for equality and partnership in the post-2015 development era. Special Gender and Development Publication. New York, NY: United Women (UNIFEM).
3. Beer, A. and Watson, D. (2008). “Personality Judgement at Zero Acquaintance: Agreement, Assumed Similarity, and Implicit Simplicity,” Journal of Personality Assessment 90, no. 3 (2008): 252.
4. Bigelow, L. S., Lundmark, L., McLean Parks, J. M., & Wuebker, R. (2012). Skirting the issues? Experimental evidence of gender bias in IPO prospectus evaluations. Social Science Research Network. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1556449 Accessed: June 2023
5. Bonte, P. & Izard, M. (Eds.) (2007). Dic?ionarde etnologie ?i antropologie [Ethnology and Anthropology Dictionary]. Ia?i: Editura Polirom.