Learner perspectives on corporate world involvement in secondary schools’ curricula

Author:

Lamula-Mthanti Bawinile,Ngoca NtuthukoORCID,Moreeng Boitumelo B.ORCID

Abstract

South Africa is in a competitive global economy, with enterprises, industries, and service sectors demanding world-class academic, technical, and professional skills and competence. To meet these expectations, the secondary school education system must deliver high-quality learning experiences that connect all secondary school students to the real world by building a strong foundation of academic, technical, and work-related skills. This study’s aim is to explore the corporate world's involvement in the advancement of secondary school learners in moulding learners to be assets for a future workforce. In this study, we borrowed the theory of Bourdieu’s (1995) Social Theory to analyse data and to answer our question: To what degree does the corporate world involvement in secondary school benefit learners? We choose the constructivist paradigm in order to use qualitative methodologies to investigate the reality of the participants. Semi-structured interviews and photovoice were employed to collect data for this study. The population sample comprised of two secondary schools from which the researchers sought to acquire learner perspectives’ and to draw conclusions about how much the corporate sector has been able to contribute to the secondary schools to benefit learners. The study discovered that corporate world businesses get involved in various ways such as offering bursaries to learners, motivational workshops, sports kits, and so forth. This type of involvement by the corporate world usually results in improved teaching and learning, workplace experience, and chances for future employability.

Publisher

Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference36 articles.

1. Anderson, M., Hinz, B. & Matus, H. (2017). The Paradigm Shifters: Entrepreneurial Learning in Schools. Research report, Mitchell Institute Report No. 04/2017. Mitchell Institute, Melbourne. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/444770.

2. Atkins. L. & Duckworth. V. (2019). Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity I Education. Great British. Bloomsbury. https://www.amazon.com ›Research-Metods Justice-e

3. Badgett, B. (2016). School-Business partnership: Understanding business perspectives. School Community Journal, 26 (2): 83-105. https://files.eric.ed.gov

4. Ball, J. (2020). A Research Guide to help distinguish between quantitative and qualitative methods of interviewing. University of the South 178 Georgia Avenue, Sewanee, TN 37383. https://library.sewanee.edu Research Guides

5. Blaikie, N. & Priest, J. (2019). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. 3rd ed. Polity Press. https://www.wiley.com › en-us

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3