Conceptualising a research interrogating of management functions in the South African National Defence Force

Author:

De Ridder MornayORCID,Wotela Kambidima

Abstract

South African Defence Review 2015 found that the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) is in significant decline and will lose important military capabilities in the long term if nothing is done. In a shrinking defense budget, general rhetoric blames aging equipment and staff for the decline. However, managerial issues in the SANDF may be to blame for the decline. We examined academic and other literature to find the origin of this problem and found that the SANDF does not use any systems management methodology to manage tasks. This peculiarity hinders SANDF management and prevents it from providing credible defense to South Africa. We found that empirical studies on SANDF management are scarce and failed to explain this oddity. To understand why the SANDF's application inherent management functions fail to provide a genuine defense capacity, this paper proposes a cognitive technique to conceptualize an empirical investigation beyond a literature review. We propose a systems management approach based on the Administrative Theory of Management, Neoclassical Theory of Management, and General Systems Theory frameworks in management education. We believe that empirical public and management research may create defence capabilities management understanding. This premise guides our study conceptualization by outlining the research context and then doing a research problem analysis to find the knowledge gap. To examine the literature, we use thematic summative content analysis. The research conceptualisation—problem statement, purpose statement, research questions, strategy, design, process, and methods, and interpretative frameworks—is based on this analysis. On the latter, we expect to write later.

Publisher

Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference54 articles.

1. Africa, S., & Molomo, M. (2013). Security in Southern Africa: The State of Debate. Southern African Security Review 2013, 13-26. (A. Van Nieuwkerk, & K. Hofman, Eds.) Johannesburg: Univertsity of the Witwatersrand.

2. Babbie, E. (2001). The pratice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Thomas Learning.

3. Baker, D.-P., & O'Neill, M. (2010). Introduction: Contemporary South Africa and Counterinsurgency. In D.-P. Baker, & E. Jordaan (Eds.), South Africa and Contemporary Counterinsurgency, Roots, Practices, Prospects (pp. 1-11). Claremont: UCT Press.

4. Berniker, E., & McNabb, D. E. (2006). Dialectical Inquiry: A Structured Qualitative Research Method. The Qulitative Report, 11(4), 642-664. Retrieved May 08, 2019, from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol11/iss4/2/

5. Booysen, S. (2001). Transitions and Trends in Policymaking in Democratic South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 36(2), 125-144.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3