The use of theoretical frameworks by Master of Public Administration (MPA) graduates at a selected South African university of technology

Author:

Hendrickse RozendaORCID

Abstract

Scholars contend that public administration, as a discipline, is still in its infancy and, more often than not, fumbles for its own identity.  It is generally regarded as an amalgamation of various disciplines. It is therefore no wonder that scholars in public administration, more often than not, fail to locate their empirical research, in sound theoretical frameworks for research in public administration, in general.  The core objective of the study was to determine whether Master of Public Administration (MPA) graduates, from a selected university of technology in South Africa, grounded their research in theoretical frameworks, rooted in the identified public administration domains.  Desktop research was employed where purposely selected MPA dissertations were scrutinised, using content analysis. MPA qualifications generally comprise a range of modules in conjunction with the production of a mini-thesis.  This has not been the case at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT) since 2016.  MPA graduates are required to produce a full dissertation only.  The study intended to highlight the importance of conducting research that contributes to public administration theory development, especially at universities of technology. The study found that if CPUT wants to acquire a competitive edge in the international higher education landscape in general and in the field of public administration in particular, it must aspire to deliver MPA graduates who demonstrate the ability to grow the mass of theoretical knowledge in the discipline.  The study recommends that theoretical frameworks, in the study domains associated with research in public administration be taught explicitly in the form of seminars in the absence of teaching them in formal credit-bearing modules, which is the case at CPUT.

Publisher

Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference31 articles.

1. Auriacombe, C. J. & Holtzhausen, N. (2014). Theoretical and Philosophical Considerations in the Realm of the Social Sciences for Public Administration and Management Emerging Researchers. Administratio Publica, 22(4), 8-25.

2. Auriacombe, C.J. & Schurink, E. (2012). Conceptualising qualitative research through spiral of meaning making. Administratio Publica, 20(3), 144-169.

3. Ballard, H. (ballardh15@gmail.com). (2022). CPUT’s Department of Public Administration and Governance’s recurriculation of Master of Technology degree. [Email to:] Hendrickse, R. 15 April 2022.

4. Baloyi, M. C. (2015). Mergers in South African Higher Education: Realization of policy intentions? Unpublished PhD thesis. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. International Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3