Evaluating financial reporting guidelines in South African public schools

Author:

Ngcobo Sanele,Ndovela Sithembele Goodman

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the different financial reporting guidelines used by governing bodies in public schools across 9 provinces. Therefore, developing an integrated financial reporting framework to improve accountability by SGBs that can be used by public schools in South Africa. This situation motivates the researcher to explore the lack financial reporting by SGBs in section 21 schools. The study also aimed to make recommendations to all stakeholders on how integrated financial reporting can promote accountability and transparency. The target population consisted of 56 section 21 schools in KwaZulu Natal province. A mixed methods approach was employed, and a questionnaire was developed and sent to participants using monkey survey. In addition, principals were interviewed one on one online using Microsoft Teams. SPSS version 25 was used to analyse the data, generating table and bar graphs. The findings revealed that the department of basic education should formulate the audit committee to monitor and evaluate financial statements of section 21 schools. The independent auditors should report back to the department of basic education not to the SGB to promote transparency and accountability. The study recommends that the current financial reporting structure can be improve by adopting integrated financial reporting framework where all stakeholders are actively involved. The Auditor General should audit the independent audit that are auditing section 21 schools and give an annual report on their performance.

Publisher

Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET

Reference35 articles.

1. Anney, V.N. (2014). Ensuring quality of the finding of qualitative research. Looking at trustworthy criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2): 272-281.

2. Babbie E (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

3. Beckham, J. & Wills, B. K. (2016). School Boards: responsibilities, duties, decision-making and legal basis for local school board powers, Washington: Washington State University.

4. Braun V & Clarke V (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77-101

5. Brewer, S.R. (2016). A guideline to improve qualitative social science publishing in ecology and conservation journals. Sydney: Resilience Alliance.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3