Abstract
The study was meant to provide a comparative analysis of the association between economic complexity and the current account performance for selected Sub-Saharan Africa and the BRICS group. Economic complexity measures the sophistication of a country’s productive structure by combining information on the diversity of a country (the number of products it exports), and the ubiquity of its products (the number of countries that export that product). The objective was to investigate whether a short- and long-term relationship exists through a Panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PARDL) for 1994 – 2018. Additionally, agricultural exports were also incorporated to measure against the economic complexity Index (ECI). On the current account-ECI relationship, the PARDL estimates exposed a positive and significant impact from ECI on the current account performance in both groups in the long run, while short-run results were insignificant. On the other hand, agricultural exports were an insignificant predictor of the current account in both groups in the long run. However, only the BRICS realised a significant negative contribution in the short-run. Hence, it is essential, especially the still developing selected SSA, to improve upon its ECI to facilitate a current account improvement better. There is a need to modernise the agricultural and agro-industries in the selected SSA. The region should harness the full potential of its agricultural sector and also the overall, abundance of raw resources to advance process-led products for the export market.
Publisher
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Appleyard, D. R. and Field, A. J. (2014). International Economics. 8th Edition. Mcgraw-Hill/Irwin.
2. Bhorat, H., Steenkamp, F. and Rooney, C. (2017). Sub-Saharan Africa’s Manufacturing Sector: Building Complexity. 256. Abidjan. Available At: Https://Www.Afdb.Org/En/Documents/Publications/Working-Paper-Series/. Available at: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/WPS_No_256_Manufacturing__Employment-Complexity_Analysis_Zc_.pdf (Accessed: 17 July 2029).
3. Bhorat, H., Steenkamp, F., & Rooney, C. (2016). Africa’s manufacturing malaise (No. 2063-2018-649). http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.267780
4. Bidirici, M., & Bohur, E. (2015). Design and economic growth: Panel cointegration and causality analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.359.
5. Borkakoti, J. (1998). The neotechnology theory of international trade. In International Trade: Causes and Consequences (pp. 313-337). Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27014-9_21