Affiliation:
1. KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HAVACILIK VE UZAY BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
2. KOCAELI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS
Abstract
An aerodynamic technique for calculating lift and drag coefficients is one of the required instruments in the wing design process. In recent decades, several tools and software have been developed based on aerodynamics and numerical methods. Today, aircraft architecture needs a great deal of calculation. To prevent expensive model testing, modern technologists use numerous simulation techniques. The present work explains how wing profiles can be modelled using ANSYS Fluent and tested by low velocity testing in the light of experimental literature results. With the chosen wing profile, the geometries formed in two dimensions and designed in 3 dimensions. As the method of study of the wing profiles, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was chosen. In the approximation area equal to the true wind tunnel scale, Wing profiles formed at 0 to 20-degree attack angles are solved and equations are solved with the RNG k-Epsilon turbulence model. With Ansys Mesher, the grid development process was carried out, the solution stage and the result show operations were carried out with the CFD Post software. The study of the low velocity and high transport wing profiles, the drag coefficient, the lift coefficient, and the effect on the lift-drag ratio were studied using a numerical procedure. After the high efficiency of wing profiles was obtained, the production of a selected profile was started by making a static examination.
Publisher
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Reference37 articles.
1. Chitte P., Jadhav P. K., & Bansode S. S. (2013). Statistic and Dynamic Analysis of Typical Wing Structure of Aircraft Using Nastran, International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management, ISSN: 2319-4847.
2. Kumara S. M., Raghavendra K., Venkataswamy A. M., Ramachandra H. V. (2012). Fractographic Analysis of Tensile Failures of Aerospace Grade Composites, Material Research, 15(6), 990-997.
3. Schmid Fuertes T.A., Kruse T., Korwien T., & Geistbeck M. (2015). Bonding of CFRP Primary Aerospace Structures - Discussion of the Certification Boundary Conditions and Related Technology Fields Addressing the Needs for Development, Composite Interfaces. 22(8), pp. 795-808.
4. Davies P., Choqueuse D., & Devaux H. (2012). Failure of Polymer Matrix Composites in Marine and Off-shore Applications, Editors: Robinson P., Greenhalgh E., Pinho S., Failure Mechanisms in Polymer Matrix Composites, 1st ed., Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 300-336.
5. Aviation Outlook (2021), Available at: https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/aviation-outlook-fuel-pricing-ignites-demand-for-composites-in-commercial-transports.