Abstract
Given a growing global population and shift to embrace the blue economy, a need for marine spatial planning (MSP) has emerged in South Africa to sustainably resolve the rising conflicts over the use of marine and seabed resources and services. A well-developed marine spatial plan yields numerous ecological, social and economic benefits. These are achieved through mediating between spatially conflicting economic drivers’ interests (e.g. commercial fishing, tourism, mining), preventing their activities from compromising thresholds of an environment’s sustainability. Within the MSP framework, high-resolution geospatial datasets are required to document and describe the seabed in the highest possible detail. At any scale, integrated analysis of seabed geomorphology and habitats is anticipated to greatly improve the understanding of ecosystem functioning from a multidisciplinary perspective, whilst improving MSP procedures and management of marine space. South Africa is the first of few African countries to have an approved and implemented MSP framework, but is still somewhat behind globally in implementing large-scale regional hydroacoustic surveys to cover the country’s vast offshore territory. The deficiency of hydroacoustic surveys is perhaps due to a relative lack of funds and poor communication about the value of multibeam echo-sounder (MBES) derived data, whilst marine geoscience remains a scarce skill in the country. This review paper presents a geological perspective of MSP and explores (1) the value that seabed mapping offers MSP specifically and (2) the need to increase seabed mapping with MBES, using a recently initiated project from the South African east coast as a case study.
Significance:
The collected MBES data (our case study) provides unprecedented seabed detail of the complex reef habitat and adjacent areas within specific management zones of the uThukela Banks Marine Protected Area. We reveal seabed features and their spatial distribution at a scale not possible using earlier (singlebeam) seabed mapping techniques. These high-resolution data will enable a better understanding of east coast marine habitats whilst contributing to improved spatial management of areas within and around the uThukela Banks Marine Protected Area.
Funder
South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity
National Research Foundation
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference79 articles.
1. Harris J, Lombard AT. Socio-ecological resilience in South Africa's blue economy: The role of marine protected areas. Policy Briefing No 176. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs; 2018.
2. Ehler CN, Zaucha J, Gee K. Maritime/marine spatial planning at the interface of research and practice. In: Zaucha J, Gee K, editors. Maritime spatial planning: Past, present, future. London: Palgrave; 2019. p. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_1
3. South African Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME). Operation Phakisa: Oceans Economy Lab [webpage on the Internet]. c2015 [cited 2022 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.operationphakisa.gov.za/operations/oel/pages/default.aspx
4. Dorrington RA, Lombard AT, Bornman TG, Adams JB, Cawthra HC, Deyzel S,et al. Working together for our oceans: A marine spatial plan for Algoa Bay, South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 2018;114(3/4), Art. #a0247. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/a0247
5. Ehler CN, Douvere F. Marine spatial planning: A step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. IOC Manual and Guides No. 53 (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme). Paris: Unesco; 2009.