Abstract
Construction and demolition (C&D) waste is generated from the construction, renovation, repair and demolition of the built environment. It is one of the largest waste streams and is generally not well documented or understood. Various methods for estimating C&D waste are reviewed, and the development of two methods for estimating C&D waste quantities and composition generated in South Africa is discussed. The lifetime method is based on current production quantities of key construction materials and their typical stock life. This is contrasted with the scale-up of a pocket of reasonably good statistics for Cape Town’s C&D waste on a per-capita basis to determine totals for South Africa. The lifetime method yielded a result of 20.2 Mt of potential C&D waste generated in South Africa in 2017, while the per-capita method suggests that 10.8 Mt of C&D waste reached disposal sites. These quantities are much higher than the 4.48 Mt reported in official national statistics for 2017. It is important to understand and accurately quantify C&D waste in South Africa so that effective waste management can be implemented. Specifically, the reuse of C&D waste needs to be understood, as this takes precedence over recycling or downcycling according to circular economy principles. Overall, this research highlights that C&D waste quantities in South Africa appear to be considerably underreported, undermining attempts to introduce more sustainable waste management practices.Significance:
The results of both methods used in this study were significantly higher than reported in official South African statistics, indicating considerable underreporting in national databases as in most waste statistics worldwide.
The informal sector is plausibly an intensive reuser of discarded building materials and demolition products from the formal sector. The omission of these informal waste management practices is a likely contributor to the difference between the official statistics and both estimates.
It is important to accurately quantify this waste stream as this can contribute to increasing materials circularity in South Africa and lower environmental impact through the achievement of circular economy goals.
Funder
National Research Foundation
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference32 articles.
1. 1. Shen LY, Wu YZ, Chan EHW, Hao JL. Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction projects. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A. 2005;6(4):339-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02842066
2. 2. Poon CS, Yu ATW, See SC, Cheung E. Minimizing demolition wastes in Hong Kong public housing projects. Constr Manag Econ. 2004;22(8):799-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000213283
3. 3. South African Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA). South Africa state of waste report. Pretoria: DEA; 2018. Available from: http://sawic.environment. gov.za/?menu=346
4. 4. City of Cape Town. 3rd generation integrated waste management plan. Cape Town: City of Cape Town; 2017. Available from: https://resource. capetown.gov.za/documentcentre/Documents/City strategies, plans and frameworks/Integrated Waste Management Plan.pdf
5. 5. Wu Z, Yu ATW, Shen L, Liu G. Quantifying construction and demolition waste: An analytical review. Waste Manag. 2014;34(9):1683-1692. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献