The moral claim for obligatory dissemination of study results: part one

Author:

Motloba P,Moipolai P

Abstract

The process of taking data from a person or community when doing research, and then publishing such data and one’s academic interpretation thereof in an academic journal, is usually well protected and scrutinized by several ethical checks and balances. However, to disseminate research findings back to the community in which the research was conducted is seen as a fundamental principle in ethical research practice that seldom materializes into reality. When researchers appropriately respect their obligation to do this, it is often filled with nuanced challenges. Researchers must consider how to convey complex findings in a way that is understandable and actionable for the community. Different communities have different views on norms, values and communication preferences. Researchers must be culturally sensitive in how they share findings to ensure relevance and respect. Dissemination may require resources such as translation services, community meetings or educational materials. It’s essential to share not only positive results but also negative or inconclusive findings. This avoids bias and helps the community make informed decisions.

Publisher

Academy of Science of South Africa

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3