Abstract
In the current transnational discourse on fourth-wave feminism, “intersectional feminism” is a fundamental concept. The representation of marginalised voices of especially Black women from underrepresented contexts, such as the Global South, is emphasised in an attempt to decolonise the formal domains of literature, academia and the media. Historically, there is a gap in the representation of diverse Black female voices in South African literatures. However, there has recently been an increase in the publication of the literary texts by previously marginalised voices, especially in Afrikaans poetry. Diverse perspectives are shared regarding the complexities of the intersection of identity categories including race, gender, culture, identity, class, language and socioeconomic status in South African society, and how it affects the previously marginalised. A voice that represents intersectional feminist issues in the South African and Afrikaans contexts can be found in Lynthia Julius’s debut poetry book, Uit die kroes (From the kroes, 2020). In this article, the significance of Julius’s unique, intersectional feminist viewpoint, with stories and perspectives from the Northern Cape, is investigated. The focus is specifically on how Julius represents a ‘triple marginalised’ voice in the South African and Afrikaans contexts with regard to her gender, race and language. Furthermore, I will discuss how the uniqueness of her collection of poems and Northern Cape Afrikaans, that have rarely been provided with a platform in the Afrikaans literary canon, contribute to giving a voice to the historic ‘voiceless’. The importance of Julius’s voice and how it highlights the heterogeneity of previously marginalised groups in South Africa, are also explored. In conclusion it is argued that the publication of poets with diverse intersectional feminist perspectives, such as Julius, can be deemed a positive step in the direction of the decolonising process of the Afrikaans literature and feminism.
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Reference61 articles.
1. Adhikari, Mohamed. “From Narratives of Miscegenation to Post-modernist Re-imagining: Towards a Historiography of Coloured Identity in South Africa.” African Historical Review vol. 40, np. 1, 2008, pp. 77–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17532520802249472.
2. America, Carina & Le Grange, Lesley. “Dekolonisering van die kurrikulum: ’n Kontekstualisering van Ekonomie- en Besigheidstudie-onderrig.” Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe vol. 59, no. 1, 2019, pp. 106–23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2019/v59n1a7.
3. Amos, Valerie & Pratibha Parmar. “Challenging Imperial Feminism.” Many Voices, One Chant: Black Feminist Perspectives vol. 17, 1984, pp. 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1395006.
4. Baderoon, Gabeba. “Introduction.” Our Words, Our Worlds, geredigeer deur Makhosazana Xaba. U of KwaZulu-Natal P, 2019. pp. 1–10.
5. Bagalini, Adwoa. “Colourism: How skin-tone bias affects racial equality at work.” World Economic Forum. 26 Aug. 2020. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/racial-equality-skin-tone-bias-colourism/.