Affiliation:
1. Fellow ASME
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
Abstract
The Cattaneo–Mindlin concept of interfacial slip in tangentially loaded compliant bodies is revisited and its basic simplifying assumptions are critically examined. It is shown that these assumptions, which, in the absence of modern numerical techniques, were essential in 1949 to enable an elegant quantitative solution of the basic problem of presliding between contacting bodies, may be nonphysical. An alternative approach to the same problem that is based on treating sliding inception as a failure mode involving material plastic yield is discussed. This alternative approach was suggested even before 1949 but for the same lack of modern numerical techniques could only be promoted qualitatively. Some recent theoretical models, which are based on this earlier alternative approach, and in which the simplifying assumptions of the Cattaneo–Mindlin concept were completely relaxed, are described along with their experimental verification. It is shown that the presliding problem between contacting bodies can be accurately solved by these models using realistic physical assumptions and failure criterion.
Subject
Surfaces, Coatings and Films,Surfaces and Interfaces,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference49 articles.
1. Sul Contato di Due Corpo Elastici;Cattaneo;Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei, Cl. Sci. Fis., Mat. Nat., Rend.
2. Compliance of Elastic Bodies in Contact;Mindlin;ASME Trans. J. Appl. Mech.
3. Elastic Spheres in Contact Under Varying Oblique Forces;Mindlin;ASME Trans. J. Appl. Mech.
4. Relation Between Friction and Adhesion;McFarlane;Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
5. The Static Coefficient of Friction and the Area of Contact;Parker;Proc. Phys. Soc. London, Sect. B
Cited by
65 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献