Affiliation:
1. Mem. ASME U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Vehicle Technology Directorate, 4603 Flare Loop Drive, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 e-mail:
2. Mem. ASME Convergent Science, Inc., 6400 Enterprise Ln, Madison, WI 53719 e-mail:
3. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Vehicle Technology Directorate, 4603 Flare Loop Drive, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 e-mail:
Abstract
In military propulsion applications, the characterization of internal combustion engines operating with jet fuel is vital to understand engine performance, combustion phasing, and emissions when JP-8 is fully substituted for diesel fuel. In this work, high-resolution large eddy simulation (LES) simulations have been performed in-order to provide a comprehensive analysis of the detailed mixture formation process in engine sprays for nozzle configurations of interest to the Army. The first phase examines the behavior of a nonreacting evaporating spray, and demonstrates the accuracy in predicting liquid and vapor transient penetration profiles using a multirealization statistical grid-converged approach. The study was conducted using a suite of single-orifice injectors ranging from 40 to 147 μm at a rail pressure of 1000 bar and chamber conditions at 900 K and 60 bar. The next phase models the nonpremixed combustion behavior of reacting sprays and investigates the submodel ability to predict auto-ignition and lift-off length (LOL) dynamics. The model is constructed using a Kelvin Helmholtz–Rayleigh Taylor (KH–RT) spray atomization framework coupled to an LES approach. The liquid physical properties are defined using a JP-8 mixture containing 80% n-decane and 20% trimethylbenzene (TMB), while the gas phase utilizes the Aachen kinetic mechanism (Hummer, et al., 2007, “Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study of Combustion of JP-8, Its Surrogates, and Reference Components in Laminar Non Premixed Flows,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, pp. 393–400 and Honnet, et al., 2009, “A Surrogate Fuel for Kerosene,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32, pp. 485–492) and a detailed chemistry combustion approach. The results are in good agreement with the spray combustion measurements from the Army Research Laboratory (ARL), constant pressure flow (CPF) facility, and provide a robust computational framework for further JP-8 studies of spray combustion.
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference32 articles.
1. Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays,1998
2. Comparison of Diesel Spray Combustion in Different High-Temperature High-Pressure Facilities;SAE Int. J. Engines,2010
3. Fuel Temperature Influence on Diesel Sprays in Inert and Reacting Conditions;Appl. Therm. Eng.,2012
4. Quantitative X-Ray Phase-Contrast Imaging of Air-Assisted Water Sprays With High Weber Numbers;Appl. Phys. Lett.,2006
5. Meyer, T. R., Schmidt, J. B., Nelson, S. M., Drake, J. B., Janvrin, D. M., and Heindel, T. J., 2008, “Three-Dimensional Spray Visualization Using X-Ray Computed Tomography,” 21st Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Orlando, FL.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献