Effect of Exhaust Gas Temperature Limits on the Peak Power Performance of a Turbocharged Gasoline Engine
Author:
Karnik Amey Y.1, Shelby Michael H.1
Affiliation:
1. Powertrain R&A, Ford Motor Company, 2101 Village Road, Dearborn, MI 48121
Abstract
Peak power of an engine is typically constrained by the maximum obtainable airflow. This constraint could arise directly from the airflow limitation imposed by the throttle restriction (typical for a naturally aspirated engine), or indirectly from other factors, such as various temperature limits for component protection. In this work, we evaluate the airflow limit for a turbocharged gasoline engine as dictated by the constraints on the turbine inlet temperature. Increasing the limit on the turbine inlet temperature requires the exhaust manifolds and turbine to be made out of more expensive materials that withstand higher temperatures. This expense is justifiable if operating with higher turbine inlet temperature allows noticeably higher power output, and not merely increases the allowable airflow. Experimental data show that under some conditions the increase in airflow does not increase the peak power. The effects of increasing airflow on the peak power and turbine inlet temperatures are systematically analyzed through individual accounting for the different losses affecting the engine torque. The breakdown analysis presented in this work indicates combustion phasing as a major contributing factor to whether increasing the flange temperature limit would increase the peak power.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference13 articles.
1. Lake, T., Murphy, R., Osborne, R., Russell, J., and Schamel, A., 2004, “Turbocharging Concepts for Downsized DI Gasoline Engines,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0036. 2. Ichikawa, H., Nakada, N., and Yajima, J., 2009 “The New High-Performance V6 Gasoline Turbocharged Engine From NISSAN,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1067. 3. Luttermann, C., and Mährle, W., 2007, “BMW High Precision Fuel Injection in Conjunction With Twin-Turbo Technology: A Combination for Maximum Dynamic and High Fuel Efficiency,” SAE Paper No. 2007-01-1560. 4. Fraser, N., Blaxill, H., Lumsden, G., and Bassett, M., 2009, “Challenges for Increased Efficiency Through Gasoline Engine Downsizing,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1053. 5. Yi, J., Wooldridge, S., Coulson, G., Hilditch, J., Iyer, C., Moilanen, P., Papaioannou, G., Reiche, D., Shelby, M., VanDerWege, B., Weaver, C., Xu, Z., Davis, G., Hinds, B., and Schamel, A., 2009, “Development and Optimization of the Ford 3.5 L V6 EcoBoost Combustion System,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1494.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|