Non-Nominal Path Planning of Assembly Processes

Author:

Carlson Johan S.1,So¨derberg Rikard2,Bohlin Robert1,Lindkvist Lars2,Hermansson Tomas1

Affiliation:

1. Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre for Industrial Mathematics

2. Chalmers University of Technology

Abstract

One important aspect in the assembly process design is to assure that there exist a collision-free assembly path for each part and subassembly. In order to reduce the need of physical verification the automotive industry use digital mock-up tool with collision checking for this kind of geometrical assembly analysis. To manually verify assembly feasibility in a digital mock-up tool can be hard and time consuming. Therefore, the recent development of efficient and effective automatic path planning algorithm and tools are highly motivated. However, in real production, all equipment, parts and subassemblies are inflicted by geometrical variation, often resulting in conflicts and on-line adjustments of off-line generated assembly paths. To avoid problems with on-line adjustments, state-of-the-art tools for path-planning can handle tolerances by a general clearance for all geometry. This is a worst-case strategy, not taking account for how part and assembly variation propagates through the positioning systems of the assembly resulting in geometry areas of both high and low degree of variation. Since, this latter approach results in unnecessary design changes or in too tight tolerances we have developed a new algorithm and working procedure enabling and supporting a more cost effective non-nominal path planning process for assembly operations. The basic idea of the paper is to combine state of the art technology within variation simulation and automatic path planning. By integrating variation and tolerance simulation results into the path planning algorithm we can allow the assembly path going closer to areas of low variation, while avoiding areas of high variation. The benefits of the proposed approach are illustrated on an industrial case from the automotive industry.

Publisher

ASMEDC

Reference32 articles.

1. R. Bohlin and L.E. Kavraki, (2000), Path Planning Using Lazy PRM, In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2000.

2. Cai W. , HuS. J. and YuanJ. X., (1997), Variational Method of Robust Fixture Design for 3-D Workpieces, ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science Engineering, Vol. 119, pp. 593–602, August.

3. Camelio, J. A., Hu, J. S., Ceglarek, D. J., (2001), “Modeling Variation Propagation of Multi-Station Assembly Systems with Compliant Parts,” Proceedings of the ASME Design for Manufacture Conference, September 9–12, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, USA, DETC2001/DFM-21190.

4. Canny, J. F., (1998) The Complexity of Robot Motion Planning. MIT Press.

5. Carlson, J. S., So¨derberg, R. and Lindkvist, L. (2003), Geometrical Inspection Point Reduction Based on Combined Cluster and Sensitivity Analysis, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, November 19, 2003.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3