Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle Presents Significant Differences Between Foot Types: A Biplane Fluoroscopy Study

Author:

Balsdon Megan E. R.,Bushey Kristen M.12,Dombroski Colin E.34,LeBel Marie-Eve5,Jenkyn Thomas R.167

Affiliation:

1. Wolf Orthopaedic Biomechanics Lab,Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic,Western University,London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada;

2. Department of Mechanicaland Materials Engineering,Faculty of Engineering,Western University,London, ON N6A 5B9, Canadae-mail: kristen.bushey@gmail.com

3. SoleScience Inc.,Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic,Western University,London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada;

4. Department of Physical Therapy,Faculty of Health Science,Western University,London, ON N6A 5B9, Canadae-mail: colin@solescience.ca

5. Roth-McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre,St. Joseph's Hospital,268 Grosvenor St.,London, ON N6A 4V2, Canadae-mail: mlebel4@uwo.ca

6. Department of Mechanicaland Materials Engineering,Faculty of Engineering,Western University,London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada;

7. School of Kinesiology,Faculty of Health Sciences,Western University,London, ON N6A 3K7, Canadae-mail: tjenkyn@uwo.ca

Abstract

Abstract The structure of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) affects the foot's overall function and its ability to dissipate plantar pressure forces. Previous research on the MLA includes measuring the calcaneal–first metatarsal angle using a static sagittal plane radiograph, a dynamic height-to-length ratio using marker clusters with a multisegment foot model, and a contained angle using single point markers with a multisegment foot model. The objective of this study was to use biplane fluoroscopy to measure a contained MLA angle between foot types: pes planus (low arch), pes cavus (high arch), and normal arch. Fifteen participants completed the study, five from each foot type. Markerless fluoroscopic radiostereometric analysis (fRSA) was used with a three-dimensional model of the foot bones and manually matching those bones to a pair of two-dimensional radiographic images during midstance of gait. Statistically significant differences were found between barefoot arch angles of the normal and pes cavus foot types (p = 0.036), as well as between the pes cavus and pes planus foot types (p = 0.004). Dynamic walking also resulted in a statistically significant finding compared to the static standing trials (p = 0.014). These results support the classification of individuals following a physical assessment by a foot specialist for those with pes cavus and planus foot types. The differences between static and dynamic kinematic measurements were also supported using this novel method.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3