Abstract
Presently, all man-made aircraft are optimized for one specific flight regime. Commercial aircraft fly at a specific cruising altitude at which they are most efficient, and military aircraft, which require excellent performance in many flight regimes are designed to be ‘good’ at all of them. A new concept in aviation, morphing aircraft, or aircraft that can fully change their shape, will allow for optimization at nearly any flight regime. This concept has been millennia in the making, well before mankind. Looking to various bird species, tails and wings can completely change shape to optimize their morphology for a given flight regime. Raptors, especially, have mastered the air in that they must out compete and overcome other birds while hunting. For soaring, these birds spread their wings fully to maximize their lift to drag ratio and maintain a low energy, long endurance flight. To maximize speed in a dive they will bring their wings close to their bodies to minimize drag. This study seeks to quantify the aerodynamic properties of the wing. From bird wings the aerodynamic properties of shape changing elastic structures can be understood. The coefficient of lift versus angle of attack plot of a bird wing is not like that of a typical airfoil, it has no distinct point where the wing stalls, instead the bird wing will twist into the flow. Additionally, the induced drag of an avian wing is significantly less than the theoretical induced drag on a wing predicted by the aspect ratio. A flow visualization around the slotted wingtips of a bird reveals smooth streaklines near the primary feathers. These feathers are canted downward and accordingly generate lift in the thrust direction of the wing, which acts to reduce the induced drag on the wing.
Reference29 articles.
1. Abbott, I. H. and Von Doenhoff, A. E., 1959, “Theory of Wing Sections,” Dover Publications, New York, NY.
2. Anders, J.B, 2000, “Biomimetic Flight,” NASA Langley Research Center, bees.jpl.nasa.gov/BEES2000.
3. Bonney Jr., R.et al, 1981, “Understanding Predation and Northeastern Birds of Prey,” Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources, Ithaca, NY.
4. Bruderer L , LiechtF, and BiloD, 2001, “Flexibility in Flight Behavior of Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) and House Martins (Delichon urbica) Tested in a Wind Tunnel,” Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 204, pp. 1473–1484.
5. Burgers, P., 1999, “New Ideas on Bird Flight,” TWITT Symposium.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献