Affiliation:
1. Whittle Laboratory, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB3 0DY, UK
Abstract
Three-dimensional steady multistage calculations, using the mixing plane approach, are compared with experimental measurement in a low-speed three-stage model turbine. The comparisons are made with two levels of shroud seal clearance, one representative of a real turbine and one with minimal seal clearance and almost no shroud leakage. Three different calculations are compared. The first computes the main blade path with no modeling of shroud leakage. The second includes a simple model of shroud leakage using sources and sinks on the end-walls, and the third is a multiblock calculation with all leakage paths and cavities computed. It is found that neglect of shroud leakage makes the computed velocity profiles and loss distributions significantly different to those measured. Simple modeling of shroud leakage gives some improvement but full calculation of the leakage flows and cavities is necessary to obtain good agreement between calculation and measurement.
Reference18 articles.
1. Computational Fluid Dynamics for Turbomachinery Design;Denton;Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
2. Ni, R. H., and Bogoian, J. C., 1989, “Prediction of 3D Multistage Turbine Flowfield Using a MultiGrid Euler Solver,” Paper No. AIAA-89-0203.
3. Simulation of Viscous Flow Within a Multistage Turbine;Adamczyk;ASME J. Turbomach.
4. Three-Dimensional Flowfields Inside a Transonic Compressor With Swept Blades;Hah;ASME J. Turbomach.
5. Towards Improved Throughflow Capability: The Use of 3D Viscous Flow Solvers in a Multistage Environment;Dawes;ASME J. Turbomach.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献