Rotordynamic Comparison of Built-Up Versus Solid Rotor Construction

Abstract

Most manufacturers of multi-stage centrifugal compressors for the oil and gas industry utilize a solid shaft rotor construction. The impellers use a shrink fit onto the shaft with spacers in between the impellers. With the introduction of the guidelines in the 7th edition of API 617, built-up rotors for centrifugal compressors using a tie-bolt are recognized by API. This study compares the rotordynamic performance of the identical compressor using both a tie-bolt design and a more conventional solid rotor for a two-stage pipeline application. A full API 617 lateral analysis is performed on the two designs, assuming identical impeller flow path, stage spacing, and hub diameter. The critical speed and unbalance response are computed, and a full Level 2 stability analysis is performed for each case. The results show the tie-bolt construction to be slightly lighter and stiffer, resulting in a higher critical speed and improved rotordynamic stability.