The Recuperative-Auto Thermal Reforming and the Recuperative-Reforming Gas Turbine Power Cycles With CO2 Removal—Part I: The Recuperative-Auto Thermal Reforming Cycle
Author:
Fiaschi D.1, Lombardi L.1, Tapinassi L.1
Affiliation:
1. Dipartimento di Energetica “Sergio Stecco,” University of Florence, Via Santa Marta, 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy
Abstract
The relatively innovative gas turbine based power cycles R-ATR and R-REF (Recuperative–Auto Thermal Reforming GT cycle and Recuperative–Reforming GT cycle) here proposed are mainly aimed to allow the upstream CO2 removal by the way of natural gas fuel reforming. The power unit is a gas turbine (GT), fueled with reformed and CO2 cleaned syngas produced by adding some basic sections to the simple GT cycle: • auto thermal reforming (ATR) for the R-ATR solution, where the natural gas is reformed into CO, H2,CO2,H2O, and CH4; this endothermic process is completely sustained by the heat released from the reactions between the primary fuel CH4, exhausts and steam. • water gas shift reactor (WGSR), where the reformed fuel is, as far as possible, shifted into CO2 and H2 by the addition of water. • water condensation, in order to remove a great part of the fuel gas humidity content (this water is totally reintegrated into the WGSR). • CO2 removal unit for the CO2 capture from the reformed fuel. Among these main components, several heat recovery units are inserted, together with GT cycle recuperator, compressor intercooler, and steam injection in combustion chamber. The CO2 removal potential is close to 90% with chemical scrubbing using an accurate choice of amine solution blend: the heat demand is completely provided by the power cycle itself. The possibility of applying steam blade cooling by partially using the water released from the dehumidifier downstream the WGSR has been investigated: in these conditions, the R-ATR has shown an efficiency range of 44–46%. High specific work levels have also been observed (around 450–550 kJ/kg). These efficiency values are satisfactory, especially if compared with ATR combined cycles with CO2 removal, more complex due to the steam power section. If regarded as an improvement to the simple GT cycle, R-ATR shows an interesting potential if directly applied to a current GT model; however, partial redesign with respect to the commercially available version is required. Finally, the effects of the reformed fuel gas composition and conditions on the amine CO2 absorption system have been investigated, showing the beneficial effects of increasing pressure (i.e., pressure ratio) on the thermal load per kg of removed CO2.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference27 articles.
1. Corti, A., Failli, L., Fiaschi, D., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Exergy Analysis of Two Second-Generation SCGT Plant Proposals,” Proceedings of ASME IGTI 43rd Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, June. 2. Corti, A., Lombardi, L., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Absorption of CO2 With Amines in a Semi-Closed GT Cycle: Plant Performance and Operating Costs,” Proceedings of ASME IGTI 43rd Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, June. 3. Corti, A., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Economic Analysis of a Semi-Closed Gas Turbine/Combined Cycle (SCGT/CC) With CO2 Removal by Amines Absorption,” GHGT-4, 4th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, InterLaken, Switzerland, Aug. 30–Sept. 2. 4. Corti, A., Fiaschi, D., and Manfrida, G., 1999, “Thermo-Economic Evaluation of the SCGT Cycle,” Energy Convers. Manage., 40, pp. 1917–1929. 5. Facchini, B., Fiaschi, D., and Manfrida, G., 1996; “Semi-Closed Gas Turbine/Combined Cycle With Water Recovery,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-317.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|