Simulation and Experimental Studies of Gear Backlash and Stick-Slip Friction in Hydraulic Excavator Swing Motion
-
Published:1996-09-01
Issue:3
Volume:118
Page:463-467
-
ISSN:0022-0434
-
Container-title:Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Sepehri N.1, Sassani F.2, Lawrence P. D.3, Ghasempoor A.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, MB, Canada 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada 3. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
Abstract
Inherent to any heavy-duty hydraulic machine operation with a large number of interconnected components are nonidealities such as gear backlash, friction and leakage. The swing motion of the operator’s cabin in an excavator is a typical example. In this paper we conduct a study comprising experimental, mathematical and simulation components to determine the degree to which these nonlinearities affect the performance of such machines. The inclusion of the conventional model of backlash in the simulation of the excavator swing motion is shown to be inefficient and unnecessary in terms of computation time and the final results. A new model which combines the fluid-flow and the gear train dynamics is developed. The study of contact and non-contact cases brings about proper sets of static and dynamic equations which efficiently simulate this phenomenon for the class of excavator machines under consideration. The inclusion of stick-slip friction model in the simulation shows two effects. Firstly, it causes a noticeable time-delay at the beginning of the swing motion. Secondly, it results in an overshoot during velocity control experiments. It is also shown that dry friction and leakage (cross-port or external) are as significant as gear backlash in determining the pressure patterns in the connecting hydraulic lines and, therefore, should not be overlooked, especially when the excavator cabin is brought to a stop. Often, this is the most important state event when accurate positioning is crucial. The simulation results are qualitatively supported by the experimental evidence. The experiments were performed on an instrumented teleoperated Caterpillar 215B excavator.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Instrumentation,Information Systems,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference9 articles.
1. Armstrong-Helouvery
B.
, DupontP., and Canudas De WitC., 1994, “A Survey of Models, Analysis Tools and Compensation Methods for the Control of Machines with Friction,” Automatica, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 1083–1138. 2. Haessig
D. A.
, and FriedlandB., 1991, “On Modeling and Simulation of Friction,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, Vol. 113, pp. 354–362. 3. Iyengar, S. K. R., and Fitch, E. C., 1975, “A Systematic Approach to the Analysis of Complex Fluid Power systems,” Proc. 4th Int. Fluid Power Symposium, Sheffield, England, pp. A219–A234. 4. Karnopp
D.
, 1985, “Computer Simulation of Stick-slip Friction in Mechanical Dynamic Systems,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, Vol. 107, pp. 100–103. 5. Lawrence, P. D., Sassani, F., Sauder, B., Sepehri, N., Wallersteiner, U., and Wilson, J., 1993, “Computer-Assisted Control of Excavator-Based Machines,” SAE Technical Paper No. 932486, Int. Off-Highway & Powerplant Congress & Exposition, Milwaukee, WI.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|