Affiliation:
1. ABB Corporate Research Ltd., CH-5405 Baden-Da¨ttwil, Switzerland
Abstract
Film cooling experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of coolant hole length-to-diameter ratio on the film cooling effectiveness. The results from these experiments offer an explanation for the differences between the film cooling results for cylindrical hole injection configurations previously reported by Goldstein et al. (1974), Pedersen et al. (1977), and Sinha et al. (1991). The previously reported injection configurations differed primarily in coolant hole length-to-diameter ratio. The present experiments were conducted with a row of cylindrical holes oriented at 35 deg to a constant-velocity external flow, systematically varying the hole length-to-diameter ratios (L/D = 1.75, 3.5, 5, 7, and 18), and blowing rates (0.52 ≤ M ≤ 1.56). Results from these experiments show in a region 5 ≤ X/D ≤ 50 downstream of coolant injection that the coolant flow guiding capability in the cylindrical hole was apparently established after five hole diameters and no significant changes in the film cooling effectiveness distribution could be observed for the greater L/D. However, the film cooling effectiveness characteristics generally decreased with decreasing hole L/D ratio in the range of 1.75 ≤ L/D ≤ 5.0. This decrease in film cooling performance was attributed to (1) the undeveloped character of the flow in the coolant channels and (2) the greater effective injection angle of the coolant flow with respect to the external flow direction and surface. The lowest values of film cooling effectiveness were measured for the smallest hole length-to-diameter ratio, L/D = 1.75.
Reference12 articles.
1. Burd, S. W., and Simon, T. W., 1997, “The influence of coolant supply geometry on film coolant exit flow and surface adiabatic effectiveness,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-25.
2. Goldstein
R. J.
, EckertE. R. G., and BurggrafF., 1974, “Effects of hole geometry and density on three-dimensional film cooling,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 17, pp. 595–607.
3. Goldstein, R. J., 1971, “Film Cooling,” Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 7, Hartnett, J. P., Irving, T. F., eds., Academic Press.
4. Leylek
J. H.
, and ZerkleR. D., 1994, “Discrete-Jet Film Cooling: A Comparison of Computational Results With Experiments,” ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY, Vol. 116, pp. 358–368.
5. Papell, S. S., Wang, C. R., and Graham, R. W., 1982, “Film-Cooling Effectiveness With Developing Coolant Flow Through Straight and Curved Tubular Passages,” NASA Technical Paper 2062.
Cited by
106 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献