Affiliation:
1. e-mail:
2. Thermal and Fluid Sciences Department, United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, CT 06108
Abstract
Carbon dioxide is an attractive alternative to conventional refrigerants due to its low direct global warming effects. Unfortunately, CO2 and many alternative refrigerants have lower thermodynamic performance resulting in larger indirect emissions. The effective use of ejectors to recover part of the lost expansion work, which occurs in throttling devices, can close this performance gap and enable the use of CO2. In an ejector, the pressure of the motive fluid is converted into momentum through a choked converging-diverging nozzle, which then entrains and raises the energy of a lower-momentum suction flow. In a two-phase ejector, the motive nozzle flow is complicated by the nonequilibrium phase change affecting local sonic velocity and leading to various types of shockwaves, pseudo shocks, and expansion waves inside or outside the exit of the nozzle. Since the characteristics of the jet leaving the motive nozzle greatly affect the performance of the ejector, this paper focuses on the details of flow development and shockwave interaction within and just outside the nozzle. The analysis is based on a high-fidelity model that incorporates real-fluid properties of CO2, local mass and energy transfer between phases, and a two-phase sonic velocity model in the presence of finite-rate phase change. The model has been validated against the literature data for two-phase supersonic nozzles and overall ejector performance data. The results show that due to nonequilibrium effects and delayed phase change, the flow can choke well downstream of the minimum-area throat. In addition, Mach number profiles show that, although phase change is at a maximum near the boundaries, the flow first becomes supersonic in the interior of the flow where sound speed is lowest. Shock waves occurring within the nozzle can interact with the boundary layer flow and result in a ‘shock train’ and a sequence of subsonic and supersonic flow previously observed in single-phase nozzles. In cases with lower nozzle back pressure, the flow continues to accelerate through the nozzle and the exit pressure adjusts in a series of supersonic expansion waves.
Reference20 articles.
1. Kandil, S., Lear, W., and Sherif, S., 2006, “Design and Performance of Two-Phase Ejectors for Space Thermal Management Applications,” 4th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC), June.
2. Performance Characteristics of the Ejector Refrigeration System Based on the Constant Area Ejector Flow Model;Energy Convers. Manage.,2005
3. Performance Prediction of Steam Ejector Using Computational Fluid Dynamics: Part 1. Validation of the CFD Results;Int. J. Therm. Sci.,2007
4. Numerical and Experimental Investigations on Supersonic Ejectors;Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow,2005
5. Desevaux, P., Marynowski, T., and Mercadier, Y., 2008, “CFD Simulation of a Condensing Flow in a Supersonic Ejector: Validation Against Flow Visualization,” ISFV13 International Symposium of Flow Visualization, July.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献