Affiliation:
1. Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract
The structure of labyrinth cavity flow has been experimentally investigated in a three fin axial turbine labyrinth seal (four cavities). The geometry corresponds to a generic steam turbine rotor shroud. The relative wall motion has not been modeled. The measurements were made with specially developed low-blockage pneumatic probes and extensive wall pressure mapping. Instead of the classical picture of a circumferentially uniform leakage sheet exiting from the last labyrinth clearance, entering the channel, and uniformly spreading over the downstream channel wall, the results reveal uneven flow and the existence of high circumferential velocity within the entire exit cavity. The circumferential momentum is brought into the cavity by swirling fluid from the main channel. This fluid penetrates the cavity and breaks up the leakage sheet into individual jets spaced according to the blade passages. This gives rise to strong local cross flows that may also considerably disturb the performance of a downstream blade row.
Reference21 articles.
1. Traupel, W., 1966, “Thermische Stro¨mungsmaschinen,” Springer-Verlag.
2. Sieverding, C. H., 1984, “Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows in Turbine Passages,” ASME Paper No. 84-GT-78.
3. Moore, J., and Tilton, J. S., 1988, “Tip Leakage Flow in a Linear Turbine Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 110, 18–26.
4. Heyes, F. J. G., Hodson, H. P., and Bailey, M., 1992, “The Effect of Blade Tip Geometry on the Tip Leakage Flow in Axial Turbine Cascades,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114, pp. 543–651.
5. Sell, M., Treiber, M., Casciaro, C., and Gyarmathy, G., 1999, “Tip Clearance Affected Flow Fields in a Turbine Blade Row,” Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 201, Part A, pp. 308–318.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献