Abstract
Beginning about 80 years ago, the recognition of morphological varieties of mosquitoes was gradually replaced by the recognition of subspecies. As an examination of revisionary and detailed taxonomic studies of mosquitoes clearly shows, subspecies are untenable concepts which have been synonymized with nominotypical forms or recognized as distinct species. Thus, from our perspective, subspecies is not a functional or practical taxonomic rank. Consequently, in this study we critically assessed the taxonomic status of the 120 nominal taxa distinguished as subspecies before now to determine whether they should be recognized as separate species or synonymous names. As a result, 96 subspecies are formally elevated to specific rank, 22 are relegated to synonymy with nominotypical forms, one is considered a nomen dubium, one a species inquirenda and the names of four nominal species regarded as synonyms are revalidated. The subspecies and their new status are listed in a conspectus. The revalidated species include Anopheles argentinus (Brèthes, 1912), from synonymy with An. pseudopunctipennis Theobald, 1901c; An. peruvianus Tamayo, 1907, from synonymy with An. pseudopunctipennis as nomen dubium; Culex major Edwards, 1935, from synonymy with Cx. annulioris consimilis Newstead, 1907; and Trichoprosopon trichorryes (Dyar & Knab, 1907), from synonymy with Tr. compressum Lutz, 1905. Additionally, the type locality of Anopheles sergentii Theobald, 1907 is restricted to El Outaya, Biskra Province, Algeria. A complete list of species to be retained, added to or removed from the Encyclopedia of Life, with a few corrections, is provided.
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference811 articles.
1. Aardema, M.L., vonHoldt, B.M., Fritz, M.L. & Davis, S.R. (2020) Global evaluation of taxonomic relationships and admixture within the Culex pipiens complex of mosquitoes. Parasites & Vectors, 13, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3879-8
2. Abuelmaali, S.A., Jamaluddin, J.A.F., Noaman, K., Allam, M., Abushama, H.M., Elnaiem, D.E., Ishak, I.H., Wajidi, M.F.F., Jaal, Z. & Abu Kassim, N.F. (2021) Distribution and genetic diversity of Aedes aegypti subspecies across the Sahelian Belt in Sudan. Pathogens, 10, 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10010078
3. Adam, J.P. & Hamon, J. (1959) Description de deux nouvelles sous-espèces d’Eretmapodites œdipodius Graham, capturées en Afrique Occidentale. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie exotique, 51 (4), 524‒527. [for 1958]
4. Ahumada, M.L., Orjuela, L.I., Pareja, P.X., Conde, M., Cabarcas, D.M., Cubillos, E.F.G., Lopez, J.A., Beier, J.C., Herrera, S. & Quiñones, M.L. (2016) Spatial distributions of Anopheles species in relation to malaria incidence at 70 localities in the highly endemic Northwest and South Pacific coast regions of Colombia. Malaria Journal, 15, 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1421-4
5. Aitken, T.H.G. (1953) The anopheline fauna of Sardinia. American Journal of Hygiene Monographic Series, 20, 303–352 + i‒vi.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献