TOPSIS VE AHP ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMLERİNİN PERSONEL SEÇİM SÜRECİNE UYGULANMASI

Author:

ADA Mehmet1,ÇAKIR Hüseyin2

Affiliation:

1. GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BİLİŞİM ENSTİTÜSÜ

2. GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GAZİ EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ

Abstract

Decision making and problem solving process constitute the basis of management activity in businesses. From primitive times until today, individuals have faced the problem of decision making in various situations. Decision making is the job of choosing between alternatives. In traditional decisions, data related to the decision process are collected and analyzed, and results are evaluated. However, decisions about situations or problems that people encounter in their daily lives often have more than one and often conflicting criteria. Considering this situation, using heuristic methods to reach a decision is insufficient. Versatile decision-making problems come across businesses and / or organizations in all areas of life. Decision makers mostly make decisions when there are more than one factor and criteria with different scalability. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) can be defined as the decision-making process by using at least two criteria within a set of countably finite or uncountable choices. Especially, it will be convenient for managers at strategic level to operate Multi-Criteria Decision Making processes in order to make the most appropriate decision in complex decision problems. Multi-criteria decision making techniques consist of methods aiming to reach the “best fit” solution by using multiple criteria with different scalability. In this study, a Decision Support System that meets the decision-making needs of the manager by operating two different MCDM processes together is proposed. In this context, AHP (Analytic Hierarcy Process) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) MCDM methods were used together. AHP method was used to determine the weights of selection criteria, and TOPSIS method was used to rank the candidates in the light of determined criteria. Both MCDM methods mentioned are described as "single criteria synthesis approach excluding incommensurability".

Publisher

International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry

Subject

Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering

Reference17 articles.

1. Laudon, K.C. and J.P. Laudon, Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. 2006, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

2. Gökçen, H., Yönetim bilgi sistemleri. 2007, Ankara: Afşar Yayınevi.

3. Mintzberg, H. and F. Westley, Decision making: it’s not what you think. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2001. 42(3): p. 89.

4. Soner, S. and S. Önüt, Multi-criteria supplier selection: An ELECTRE-AHP application. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2006. 4: p. 110-120.

5. Kaya, P., E.I. Cetin, and A. Kuruüzüm, Çok kriterli karar verme ile avrupa birliği ve aday ülkelerin yaşam kalitesinin analizi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 2011. 13: p. 80-94.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3