OPTIMIZATION OF ACCURACY AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF 3D SLA PRINTED MATERIALS WITH RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD
Author:
ALBAŞKARA Mehmet1ORCID, TÜRKYILMAZ Serkan1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
3D printers are used frequently for rapid prototyping and production. SLA (stereolithographic) printers, widely used in areas requiring precision production, form the final shape by solidifying the liquid resin with UV rays. In SLA printing, the final figure is created by changing many printing parameters. For this reason, surface integrity and precision of measurements vary. Dimensional accuracy (DA) and surface roughness (SR) outputs should be investigated for precise printing. Therefore, the effects on SR and DA output parameters were investigated by changing the layer height, exposure time, and lift input parameters with the Response Surface Method (RSM). The effective parameters for both outputs are layer height and lift. As the layer height and lift increased, the SR and DA values of the printed parts increased. The predicted results calculated with the regression equations and the experimental results were quite close. Optimum input parameters were found by multi-response optimization. Accordingly, the 8th experiment, 0.05mm-4s-1.5mm, was the best parameter. The difference between the predicted and experimental values for multi-response optimization was 4.28% for SR and 0.27% for DA. Thus, effective parameters for SR and DA have been determined for precision production in SLA printers.
Publisher
International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry
Subject
Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference37 articles.
1. 1. Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H.M., Shrestha, P.L., Bastola, A.K., “3D/4D printing of polymers: fused deposition modelling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA)”, Polymers, Vol. 13, Issue 18, Pages 1-37, 2021. 2. 2. Li, P., Fernandez, P.K., Spintzyk, S., Schmidt, F., Beuer, F., Unkovskiy, A., “Effect of additive manufacturing method and build angle on surface characteristics and Candida albicans adhesion to 3D printed denture base polymers”, Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 116, Pages 1-7, 2022. 3. 3. Cosmi, F., Maso, A.D., “A mechanical characterization of SLA 3D-printed specimens for low-budget applications”, Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 32, Issue 2, Pages 194-201, 2020. 4. 4. Shahrubudin, N., Lee, T.C., Ramlan, R., “An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 35, 1286–1296 Pages, 2019. 5. 5. Pagac, M., Hajnys, J., Ma, Q.-P., Jancar, L., Jansa, J., Stefek, P., Mesicek, J., “A Review of Vat Photopolymerization Technology: Materials, Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends of 3D Printing”, Polymers, Vol. 13, 598, 2021.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|