Students’ Cognitive Load in Online Education, Under the Lens of Learning Theories

Author:

,BĂNUȚ MariusORCID,ANDRONACHE DanielORCID,

Abstract

"There is a link between learning theories and online education in the sense that the use of certain e-Tools available in educational platforms could be biased by the epistemological beliefs of the teachers. The complexity of the educational message, in relation to the biased e-Tools selection for the learning task, together with the information processing that derives from the learning activity contributes to the intrinsic cognitive load. In order to optimize this cognitive load that can reach a high and an undesirable level for learning, this article aims to bridge online learning with the main theories of learning and cognitive load theory. The triangulation of these data, based on several sources from the specialized literature, provides an extended picture of the dominant cognitive processes determined by the tools used in the online learning space. This article could represent a source for the theoretical foundation of an online learning instructional design and for placing the online education closer to methodology, rather than technology. Keywords: online learning, instructional design, cognitive load, information processing, learning theories"

Publisher

Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca

Reference49 articles.

1. "1. Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of social sciences, literature and languages, 1(1), 9-16.

2. 2. Andronache, D. & Bănuț, M. (2021). Conjuncția teoriilor învățării cu educația online: între metodologie și tehnologie [Bridging learning theories with online education: Between methodology and technology]. In Ion Albulescu, Horațiu Catalano (coord.), e-Didactica. Procesul de instruire în mediul online, (pp. 137-176) Didactica Publishing House, București.

3. 3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought & Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

4. 4. Ben-Jacob, M. G. (2017). Assessment: classic and innovative approaches. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 46-51. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2017.51004

5. 5. Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction, Cambridge: Belkapp Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3