Affiliation:
1. Department of Anthropology, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USA..
Abstract
This article provides a summary of the Dalrymple Lectures delivered November 18–21, 2019. It examines the troubled, and troubling, idea of ‘civilization’, charting a path toward rehabilitation not as a descriptive category but as an analytic concept. Returning to the term's 18th century origins, civilization here describes neither a state of being nor a set of personal qualities but an apparatus, a machine that generates recognition by setting the material terms for who is like and who is Other. It does so through the generation of at least three forms of value – metaphysical, epistemic, and ethical. By retheorizing civilization as a means instead of an ends, as an apparatus that generates the values at the heart of large-scale publics instead of an exclusionary monumental aesthetic, new analytic terrain is opened for a discredited term. The operation of civilization machines is interrogated through studies situated in the South Caucasus and Armenian Highland that extend from the Early Bronze Age to the present.
Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Subject
Archeology,Archeology,Cultural Studies
Reference77 articles.
1. Aristotle. 1944 Politics. Translated by H. Rackham. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.perseus-eng1.
2. Beneviste, E. 2009 Civilization: A Contribution to the History of the Word. In Civilization: Critical Concepts in Political Science, edited by Brett Bowden, pp. 131–139. Routledge, London.