Economic impact of bridge functionality loss from a resilience perspective: Queensferry Crossing, UK

Author:

Smith Alec W.1,Argyroudis Sotirios A.2ORCID,Winter Mike G.3ORCID,Mitoulis Stergios A.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Undergraduate student, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK

2. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brunel University, London, UK; Visiting Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK

3. Director, Winter Associates Limited, Kirknewton, Midlothian, UK

4. Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK (corresponding author: )

Abstract

Understanding the resilience of transport networks is critical for efficient asset management. This paper takes an innovative approach to studying the operability of the Queensferry Crossing (QFC), UK, including cost–benefit aspects. A key driver for the QFC was to increase the resilience of the A90/M90 link by reducing weather-related closures. The first weather-related closure of the QFC was in February 2020, when ice formed on the superstructure cables and fell on the carriageway and vehicles, creating a safety risk for bridge users. The bridge was closed for 41 h and, in this paper, the estimated monetary losses are compared with those of past Forth Road Bridge (FRB) closures. The costs of potential mitigation measures are then assessed in the context of closure costs, thus improving the resilience of the QFC. Although the QFC has only been open for 3 years, it is already apparent that it is significantly more resilient than the largely replaced FRB, whether this is considered as the number, duration or costs of closures and that this will be substantially improved by the planned use of the FRB during future closures of the QFC. Investment in mitigation measures is a potentially cost-effective solution although the form of any suitable ice prevention or removal system is, as yet, far from clear.

Publisher

Thomas Telford Ltd.

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3