Refinement of K-stiffness Method for geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls

Author:

Bathurst R. J.1,Miyata Y.2,Nernheim A.3,Allen A. M.4

Affiliation:

1. GeoEngineering Centre at Queen's-RMC, Department of Civil Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada Kingston, Ontario, K7K 7B4, Canada Telephone: (ext. 6479/6347/6391); Telefax: ,

2. GeoEngineering Centre at Queen's-RMC, Royal Military College of Canada Kingston, Ontario, K7K 7B4 Canada; Permanent address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National Defense Academy, 1-10-20 Hashirimizu, Yokosuka 239-8686, Japan, Telephone: ; Telefax: ;

3. GeoEngineering Centre at Queen's-RMC, Royal Military College of Canada Kingston, Ontario, K7K 7B4, Canada Permanent address: Faculty of Energy, Natural Resources, Management and Economics, Clausthal University of Technology, Erzstrasse 20, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany, Telephone: ; Telefax: ;

4. Washington State Department of Transportation, State Materials Laboratory Olympia, Washington, 98504-7365, USA Telephone: ; Telefax: ,

Abstract

The K-stiffness Method is an empirically-developed working stress method used to compute reinforcement loads for the internal stability design of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls under serviceability conditions. In this paper, additional data from Japanese case studies for five full-scale field and three full-scale laboratory geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls are added to the database that was used to calibrate the original K-stiffness Method. One more case study from an instrumented wall in the USA is also introduced. Measured loads are compared with predicted loads using the current AASHTO Simplified Method and a modified version of the K-stiffness Method that has been adjusted by back-fitting model parameters to the extended database. The AASHTO Simplified Method is shown to be excessively conservative (on average) with respect to accurate prediction of reinforcement loads and to correlate poorly with measured values. The modified K-stiffness Method is demonstrated by statistical analysis to give ratios (bias) of average measured to predicted reinforcement load values close to 1 and coefficient of variation (COV) values for the maximum reinforcement load in a wall that are less than 25%.

Publisher

Thomas Telford Ltd.

Subject

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 138 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3