Assessment of EPS block geofoam with internal drainage for sandy slopes subjected to seepage flow

Author:

Akay O.1,Özer A.T.2,Fox G.A.3

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor and Department Chair, Department of Civil Engineering, Okan University, Tuzla Campus, Istanbul 34959, Turkey, Telephone: +90 216 677 1630 x2432; Telefax: +90 216 677 1647; E-mail: onur.akay@okan.edu.tr

2. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Okan University, Tuzla Campus, Istanbul 34959, Turkey, Telephone: +90 216 677 1630 x2434; Telefax: +90 216 677 1647; E-mail: tolga.ozer@okan.edu.tr

3. Professor and Orville L. and Helen L. Buchanan Chair, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, and Interim Director, Oklahoma Water Resources Center, Oklahoma State University, 120 Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078-6016, USA, Telephone: +1 405 744 8423; Telefax: +1 405 744 6059; E-mail: garey.fox@okstate.edu

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Lightweight expanded polystyrene (EPS) block geofoam (geofoam block) is commonly used as a replacement of the heavy in situ soil during slope remediation in order to reduce driving forces. The design procedure requires the use of permanent drainage systems to alleviate hydrostatic pressures in geofoam block slope systems. In this study, small-scale laboratory lysimeter experiments investigated the behavior of a stabilized sandy slope with a geofoam block slope system experiencing seepage. An internal drainage system was incorporated by grooving dual drainage channels (weep holes) on the top and bottom side of the geofoam blocks. A lysimeter with dimensions of 60 cm height, 20 cm width, and 200 cm length was constructed in the laboratory. Slopes were constructed by compacting sand. The geofoam blocks (2.5 cm height, 5 cm width, and 15 cm length) were placed on the sandy slope face with an angle of 45° in ‘one row' and ‘two rows' configurations. The experiments were conducted under constant water pressure heads (25-, 38-, and 50-cm pressure head boundary conditions) in the water reservoir located at the opposite end of the lysimeter from the geofoam blocks. In general, the lightweight geofoam blocks could not resist earth and hydrostatic pressures under seepage. The back-slope was not self-stable under seepage conditions, and deep-seated global stability failures were observed, except for the remediated slope at the 25- and 38-cm pressure head boundary conditions. The internal drainage system was ineffective at dissipating piezometric pressures at the higher seepage gradients investigated at this lysimeter scale. Numerical slope stability modeling confirmed these observations, predicting a factor of safety below the critical value for global stability in cases where failure was observed. More elaborate geofoam block configurations and/or drainage systems should be used to increase resistance against global stability failure caused by higher seepage gradients.

Publisher

Thomas Telford Ltd.

Subject

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3