Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication

Published:2015 Issue:4 Volume:30 Page:360
ISSN:1011-8934
Container-title:Journal of Korean Medical Science
language:en
Short-container-title:J Korean Med Sci

Author:

Gasparyan Armen Yuri¹^ORCID,Gerasimov Alexey N.²^ORCID,Voronov Alexander A.³^ORCID,Kitas George D.¹⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Rheumatology and Research & Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.

2. Department of Statistics and Econometrics, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russian Federation.

3. Department of Marketing and Trade Deals, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation.

4. Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Publisher

Korean Academy of Medical Sciences

Subject

General Medicine

Link

http://synapse.koreamed.org/pdf/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.360

Cited by 63 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process;F1000Research;2024-08-27

2. Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process;F1000Research;2024-07-09

3. There is no easy fix to peer review but paying referees and regulating the number of submissions might help;F1000Research;2024-05-02

4. Viewpoint: the evolving landscape of peer review;Journal of Services Marketing;2024-03-12

5. Understanding how early-stage researchers leverage socio-technical affordances for distributed research support;Information and Software Technology;2024-01