Science on the mind: Examining question ordering effects when asking about science on large-scale surveys

Author:

Mackey Cameron D.1ORCID,Rios Kimberly2ORCID,Scheitle Christopher P.ORCID,Corcoran Katie E.ORCID,DiGregorio Bernard D.3

Affiliation:

1. Ohio University, USA

2. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA

3. West Virginia University, USA

Abstract

Previous research has examined people’s attitudes toward science and scientists, highlighting how religious identities, beliefs, or behavior shapes these attitudes. However, survey design choices have been previously shown to influence individuals’ attitudes toward religion and science. We investigated the extent to which question ordering (i.e. presenting questions about science before questions about religion or the paranormal) in a large-scale survey would influence respondents’ attitudes toward science and religion. Utilizing an experimental design, we found that responding to science questions first led to (1) more interest in science, (2) more confidence in the scientific community, (3) increased agreement that science is a way of knowing truth, (4) more confidence in responding to science knowledge items, (5) more agreement to scientific statements, and (6) more trust in scientists. We discuss the implications of question ordering when analyzing attitudes toward science and religion within the same surveys and future directions for research.

Funder

Templeton Religion Trust

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference15 articles.

1. AmeriSpeak (n.d.). Available at: https://amerispeak.norc.org/

2. Public perceptions of incompatibility between “science and religion”

3. Davern M, Bautista R, Freese J, Herd P, Morgan SL (2023) General social survey 1972–2022. Machine-Readable Data File, 7 July. Available at: https://sda.berkeley.edu/sdaweb/docs/gss22rel2/DOC/GSS2022Release2Codebook.pdf

4. Secularity and Science

5. Creating creationists: The influence of ‘issues framing’ on our understanding of public perceptions of clash narratives between evolutionary science and belief

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3