Sport-decision aids and the “CSI-effect”: Why cricket uses Hawk-Eye well and tennis uses it badly

Author:

Collins Harry1,Evans Robert1

Affiliation:

1. Cardiff University, UK

Abstract

Technologies of visualisation and measurement are changing the relationship between spectators and match officials at sporting events. Umpires and referees find themselves under increasing scrutiny and sports governing bodies are experimenting with new technologies and additional “off-field” officials in order to preserve the legitimacy of decision-making. In this paper, we examine how technologies are being used in a number of sports, paying particular attention to the way in which uncertainty and indeterminacy are conveyed to viewers and spectators. The contrast between cricket and tennis is particularly instructive in this respect as the same technology is used in two very different ways. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for implementing sports measurement technologies whilst preserving the traditions of individual sports and enriching technological culture.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Defending technology: a normative defence of technologically assisted officiating in binary referee situations;Sport, Ethics and Philosophy;2024-03-14

2. Football and the video assistant referee: A grounded theory approach;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology;2023-12-30

3. Do line call errors differ between men’s and women’s events in tennis? A case study from the 2021 Wimbledon Tournament;International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport;2023-05-04

4. The video review system in association football: implementation and effectiveness for match officials and referee education;Managing Sport and Leisure;2022-11-22

5. The impact of technology on sports – A prospective study;Technological Forecasting and Social Change;2022-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3