Perceived Negative Effects of Tic Management Strategies in Adults With Tic Disorders

Author:

Barber Kathryn E.1ORCID,Pitts Brandon X.1,Stiede Jordan T.2,Espil Flint M.3,Woods Douglas W.1,Specht Matthew W.4,Bennett Shannon M.5,Walkup John T.6,Ricketts Emily J.7,McGuire Joseph F.8,Peterson Alan L.9,Compton Scott N.10,Wilhelm Sabine11,Scahill Lawrence12,Piacentini John C.7

Affiliation:

1. Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA

2. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

3. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

4. Connecticut OCD, Anxiety, and Tic, Greenwich, USA

5. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

6. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA

7. UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA

8. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

9. The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

10. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

11. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA

12. Emory University School of Medicine Marcus Center, Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract

Behavior therapy is a well-established and empirically supported treatment for tic disorders (TDs). However, concerns have been expressed about the negative effects of behavioral interventions, such as tic worsening, tic substitution, and excessive effort. This study explored perceived negative effects of tic management strategies in adults with TDs and predictors of these experiences. Participants ( N = 72) completed semi-structured interviews 11 years after receiving behavior therapy or supportive therapy in a randomized clinical trial. We examined responses to interview questions about managing tics and predictors of reported negative effects. Most participants did not experience tic worsening (84%) or tic substitution (75%) from tic management strategies. The majority felt they could manage tics while participating in their environment (87%) and did not report life interference from tic management (77%). About half (45%) felt less present when managing tics. Treatment non-responders in the original trial were more likely to report negative effects of tic management strategies. No differences in reported negative consequences were found between those who received behavior therapy versus supportive therapy, suggesting that behavior therapy specifically does not lead to such adverse effects. These findings could reduce misconceptions about behavior therapy for TDs and enhance its acceptability and utilization.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Tourette Association of America

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3