Instruction Increases Canadian Students’ Preference for and Use of Lateral Reading Strategies to Fact-Check Online Information

Author:

Brodsky Jessica E.ORCID,Brooks Patricia J.1ORCID,Pavlounis Dimitri,Johnston Jessica Leigh2

Affiliation:

1. City University of New York

2. CIVIX

Abstract

Canadian middle and high school students (N = 2,278) completed a “CTRL-F” curriculum teaching them how to evaluate online information by reading laterally to investigate sources, check claims, and trace information to original contexts. A subset of CTRL-F students (N = 316) were in classes with teacher-matched control groups (N = 287). Some CTRL-F students (N = 994) completed a delayed posttest. At pretest, students indicated preference for some lateral reading strategies, but preference rarely translated into use. Following instruction, CTRL-F students showed greater preference for and use of lateral reading than controls and greater alignment between preference and use. The curriculum’s impact varied by demographic factors but not by differences in implementation. Gains were maintained from posttest to delayed posttest. Direct instruction and practice in lateral reading appear to strengthen connections between students’ preferences and utilization of these strategies to evaluate online content relevant to academic and personal life.

Funder

Government of Canada: Canadian Heritage’s Digital Citizen Contribution Program

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference55 articles.

1. American Democracy Project. (n.d.). Digital Polarization Initiative. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. https://www.aascu.org/AcademicAffairs/ADP/DigiPo/

2. Barber S., Brunet S., Chew Leung J., Christ G., Chénier C., Greenberg S., Lendi B., Li M., St-Amand J., Zeman K. (2020). Education indicators in Canada: An international perspective, 2020. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/81-604-x/81-604-x2020001-eng.pdf

3. Promoting Integration of Multiple Texts: a Review of Instructional Approaches and Practices

4. Research Faux Pas: The Stigma of Wikipedia

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3